Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759900AbXJQS3G (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:29:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761653AbXJQS2j (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:28:39 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:48969 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1761537AbXJQS2h (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:28:37 -0400 X-Authenticated: #5039886 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19BEFVWjrpB/EF+Tcbx4mWw306BveoGnr7Xd8pLbo 8dPG8zNF4ccU9K Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:28:34 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Steinbrink To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Al Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix adbhid mismerge Message-ID: <20071017182834.GA29359@atjola.homenet> References: <20071017000246.GE8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20071017161821.GB15918@atjola.homenet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20071017161821.GB15918@atjola.homenet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2296 Lines: 61 On 2007.10.17 18:18:21 +0200, Bj?rn Steinbrink wrote: > On 2007.10.16 19:21:53 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > I don't think you did anything wrong. You used both --full-history > > > (implicitly: git-whatchanged) and you made sure to see the diffs for both > > > sides of any merge (-m), and that means that you should see every single > > > diff involved. > > > > Btw, if anybody can come up with a better way to find these kinds of > > mis-merges, I'd love to hear about it. > > > [...] > > > > What I'd actually really like would be something that shows the original > > conflict, but that's really expensive to compute (it basically involves > > re-doing the merge from scratch - finding the proper base commit(s) etc). > > So we never did that. > > So here's what I came up with: > > git grep -l "int keycode, up_flag" \ > $(git-rev-list HEAD --parents -- drivers/macintosh/adbhid.c | \ > egrep '(.{40} ?){3}' | cut -d' ' -f1) \ > -- drivers/macintosh/adbhid.c | grep -o '^[^:]*' > > Which gives: b981d8b3f5e008ff10d993be633ad00564fc22cd > > Then: > git checkout b981d8b3f5e008ff10d993be633ad00564fc22cd^1 > git merge b981d8b3f5e008ff10d993be633ad00564fc22cd^2 > > And you got your merge conflict. > > The idea is, that the above ugliness searches for the last commit that Oops! Obviously I meant to do s/last commit/merge commit/ before sending that email. > produced the bad line. The inner git-rev-list call searches for merge > commits (thanks to Ilari in #git for the egrep trick), then git-grep > looks which of these have the "bad line" and the final grep just filters > the filename out. > > If the bash thing spits out more than one commit hash, you probably want > to use the last one... I guess... And if the given result doesn't > produce the request merge conflict, well, I guess you could replace HEAD > in the git-rev-list call with the sha1 you got in the first run, but I'm > not entirely sure about that. > > Is that helpful? > > Bj?rn - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/