Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 09:19:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 09:19:45 -0500 Received: from mail.internet-factory.de ([195.122.142.5]:9956 "EHLO mail.internet-factory.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 09:19:35 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: not-for-mail From: Holger Lubitz Newsgroups: lists.linux.kernel Subject: Re: modify_ldt returning ENOMEM on highmem Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 15:19:34 +0100 Organization: Internet Factory AG Lines: 11 Message-ID: <3C1F5076.3B6A509E@internet-factory.de> In-Reply-To: <200112171852.fBHIqJR05703@orp.orf.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: bastille.internet-factory.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: darkstar.internet-factory.de 1008685174 12978 195.122.142.158 (18 Dec 2001 14:19:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@internet-factory.de NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Dec 2001 14:19:34 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.13-ac7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Leigh Orf proclaimed: > Do you have an NTFS disk mounted? I had a similar problem which was > "fixed" by not having an NTFS vol mounted. Apparently the ntfs code > makes a lot of calls to vmalloc which leads to badness. Yes, I have. I'll try not mounting it. Which would be a better workaround than disabling 1/8 of my RAM. The funny thing is just - why does it work fine with up to 896 MB, but gives ENOMEM with _more_ RAM? Holger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/