Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Ricardo =?utf-8?Q?Ca=C3=B1uelo?= <ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     =?utf-8?Q?N=C3=ADcolas_F=2E_R=2E_A=2E_Prado?= 
        <nfraprado@collabora.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        kernel@collabora.com, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest/alsa: Increase kselftest timeout
References: <20221213183242.1908249-1-nfraprado@collabora.com> <2ee34e21-44bd-71e7-6da2-f4bea9a35452@linuxfoundation.org> <20230515094310.hulpyhhtb4sxxn7i@rcn-XPS-13-9305>
In-reply-to: <20230515094310.hulpyhhtb4sxxn7i@rcn-XPS-13-9305>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2023 09:10:39 +0200
Message-ID: <87sfarj30w.fsf@rcn-XPS-13-9305.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk


Hi Shuah,

Gentle ping for this

On lun, may 15 2023 at 11:43:10, Ricardo Ca=C3=B1uelo <ricardo.canuelo@coll=
abora.com> wrote:
> Is there a downside to that? There'll be some tests that take more time,
> I don't think that's a problem with the tests or a reason to let them
> timeout. IMO it's the test framework which should adapt to the needs of
> different types of tests, and the solution provided by this patch is
> good enough, it addresses the problem for this particular test suite.
>
> If the solution is still unacceptable, do you have an alternative
> proposal in mind that we can try to implement?

There are some tests failing because of this and we're trying to address
these problems to clean up the regression results.

Thanks,
Ricardo