Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp2506758rwd; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:49:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5RmtDCF14D+8uIxo9wNBLnHVMONzCfLRk5LdYHxHE3fcSC4ENTCb+4VZO/jbX1HmifYHOk X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:84a:b0:657:97f7:1a5 with SMTP id q10-20020a056a00084a00b0065797f701a5mr1889983pfk.23.1686916142290; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:49:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1686916142; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CUN7NnqM/xHwTbJmc9Kdew9UsSzhEc0BDM8/py8pVfha2vhhoqbLVYXCMVu+Yf2UEK 8Fk49qrVUDeh/SLH+LN3qIncZ2Gf0JXotJtdT18gNgJjB/VWQYpNVDJgc0qxWLSM/j0M rE5AiTql6kSofNiXWV6Hbo7NIAMD7Bael/MXmdngvXR/17vfYV248IVc5qKWYExREkbo oxGhr3h5/PyYw3TUywCHM+X02bjj8u2wDun3c2lIfAgbhHQXd4PtbGi6CvGuTBCYSZ3g ahgsJkdEhYLWPQn9fqB6MHdcpu3xWf12gRGe5tgAKQfTR7ZrplV0xCRGIsGQOyOQ1W8c WzvA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=v+iI7U3K/EtOzM8gDRdsGTN7rEsDzO37V5R8IXAwYUU=; b=IjYyL+x/HxwWtGtd696hs7oXstK+wtAt+SNpwDswHGCelcAlUnU4RNSqpmASocCDaz 6k/iC8njam+wFuuBJbQ9KeXAcE95pJtN+Jl/hCkiFNvlDRwtPU+0ZWTiolRx+ZLAUTMj d2DFEHS2uOW/RVz4AAP90TUvM+2viPDFmjCTJWH3CTeX6d9Wwu43a9/Ds1MF0NzDtJqO ZkOHHTw0OOrCpuOxZD6iM+J2A1y6jJbQl8cqUfEb2GTFkWXaw5BBNN2mty+F2kWRzs1n OHWfxRift4GgC/2jfRywLj3YiTBTruR8S9nLV9RwRNJptbwpT7Ra2rGqGNaBCOEk5sTE kIRQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=g+Ppoh+C; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k13-20020a636f0d000000b00542aa78ebdasi14335203pgc.838.2023.06.16.04.48.50; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=g+Ppoh+C; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344968AbjFPLfd (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Jun 2023 07:35:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52882 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344428AbjFPLfN (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2023 07:35:13 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7542330C6; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 04:35:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1686915306; x=1718451306; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d11C85anzJrQsnoOC+MkHmFIOWsBGErCjceGs/poHZk=; b=g+Ppoh+CqYsT6G8aHKE6UcXUYXLjPKtHZo5erlwVv/FXaY0zTlrjvGzc J4YerbEh/5erUGO3f/kKhoKoQGiHiVXeW008BuTddcmuj+yPoFITdKqwH JAya3G1ZiG+XlE1wXKIcbU+nTH4rYhVVIzap783pTleKHXowg/Yp87roN iRSSc6UrHwGKGvmh/XejLTQDmYuYAtBcVl+R3qy4SOapy70vJLbSO9qzz 1LAzvmf2UTnnkeCeoiLoqFSj4SeSg/dLh1KT8Y6nfvBC4tTGcBZfHPuBb 7ggem1Mwayc/RkihfzidjWUmWxyQvo6PZzRlL8eunOk0dRy4HuyUZqF2d A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10742"; a="445574807" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,247,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="445574807" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jun 2023 04:35:06 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10742"; a="782872388" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,247,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="782872388" Received: from youzhiji-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO xiongzha-desk1.ccr.corp.intel.com) ([10.249.173.213]) by fmsmga004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jun 2023 04:35:03 -0700 From: Xiong Zhang To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, like.xu.linux@gmail.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com, zhiyuan.lv@intel.com, Xiong Zhang Subject: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: selftests: Add test case for guest and host LBR preemption Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 19:33:53 +0800 Message-Id: <20230616113353.45202-5-xiong.y.zhang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20230616113353.45202-1-xiong.y.zhang@intel.com> References: <20230616113353.45202-1-xiong.y.zhang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When guest access LBR msr at the first time, kvm will create a vLBR event, vLBR event joins perf scheduler and occupy physical LBR for guest usage. Once vLBR event is active and own LBR, guest could access LBR msr. But vLBR event is per process pinned event, perf has higher priority event: per cpu pinned LBR event, perf has lower priority events also: per cpu LBR event and per process LBR event. So if host doesn't have higher priority per cpu pinned LBR event, vLBR event could occupy physical LBR always. But once per cpu pinned LBR event is active, vLBR event couldn't be active anymore, then guest couldn't access LBR msr. This commit adds test case to cover guest and host lbr contend. Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhang --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 + .../selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h | 17 ++ .../kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c | 16 -- .../kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_lbr_contend.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_lbr_contend.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile index 4761b768b773..422bbc16ba2a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_dirty_log_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_exception_with_invalid_guest_state TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_msrs_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_invalid_nested_guest_state +TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_pmu_lbr_contend TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_set_nested_state_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_tsc_adjust_test TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h index 1a6aaef5ccae..c1bb0cacf390 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/ucall_common.h @@ -35,6 +35,23 @@ void ucall(uint64_t cmd, int nargs, ...); uint64_t get_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct ucall *uc); void ucall_init(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_paddr_t mmio_gpa); +/* + * Run the VM to the next GUEST_SYNC(value), and return the value passed + * to the sync. Any other exit from the guest is fatal. + */ +static inline uint64_t run_vcpu_to_sync(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + struct ucall uc; + + vcpu_run(vcpu); + TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO); + get_ucall(vcpu, &uc); + TEST_ASSERT(uc.cmd == UCALL_SYNC, + "Received ucall other than UCALL_SYNC: %lu", uc.cmd); + + return uc.args[1]; +} + /* * Perform userspace call without any associated data. This bare call avoids * allocating a ucall struct, which can be useful if the atomic operations in diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c index 40507ed9fe8a..8c68029cfb4b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c @@ -177,22 +177,6 @@ static void amd_guest_code(void) } } -/* - * Run the VM to the next GUEST_SYNC(value), and return the value passed - * to the sync. Any other exit from the guest is fatal. - */ -static uint64_t run_vcpu_to_sync(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) -{ - struct ucall uc; - - vcpu_run(vcpu); - TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO); - get_ucall(vcpu, &uc); - TEST_ASSERT(uc.cmd == UCALL_SYNC, - "Received ucall other than UCALL_SYNC: %lu", uc.cmd); - return uc.args[1]; -} - static void run_vcpu_and_sync_pmc_results(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { uint64_t r; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_lbr_contend.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_lbr_contend.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a6a793f08515 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/vmx_pmu_lbr_contend.c @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Test for host and guest LBR preemption + * + * Copyright (C) 2021 Intel Corporation + * + */ + +#define _GNU_SOURCEGG + +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "test_util.h" +#include "kvm_util.h" +#include "processor.h" + +static void create_perf_events(int *fds, int cpu_num, bool pinned) +{ + struct perf_event_attr attr = { + .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, + .size = sizeof(attr), + .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES, + .sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK, + .sample_period = 1000, + .pinned = pinned, + .branch_sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL_STACK | + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER | + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL, + }; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < cpu_num; i++) { + fds[i] = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1, i, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC); + TEST_ASSERT(fds[i] != -1, "Failed to create lbr event on cpu%d", i); + } +} + +static void release_perf_events(int *fds, int cpu_num) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < cpu_num; i++) + close(fds[i]); +} + +#define PERF_CAP_LBR_FMT_MASK 0x1F + +#define LBR_NOT_SUPPORTED 0xFFFE +#define LBR_MSR_WRITE_ERROR 0xFFFD + +#define LBR_MODE_CHECK_PASS 0x0 +#define LBR_MSR_WRITE_SUCC 0x1 + +static bool check_lbr_msr(void) +{ + uint64_t v, old_val; + + old_val = rdmsr(MSR_LBR_TOS); + + v = old_val ^ 0x3UL; + + wrmsr(MSR_LBR_TOS, v); + if (rdmsr(MSR_LBR_TOS) != v) + return false; + + wrmsr(MSR_LBR_TOS, old_val); + if (rdmsr(MSR_LBR_TOS) != old_val) + return false; + + return true; +} + +static void guest_code(void) +{ + uint64_t v; + + v = rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES); + if ((v & PERF_CAP_LBR_FMT_MASK) == 0) + GUEST_SYNC(LBR_NOT_SUPPORTED); + + GUEST_SYNC(LBR_MODE_CHECK_PASS); + + while (1) { + if (!check_lbr_msr()) { + GUEST_SYNC(LBR_MSR_WRITE_ERROR); + continue; + } + + /* Enable LBR to avoid KVM recyling LBR. */ + v = rdmsr(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR); + v |= DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR; + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR, v); + + GUEST_SYNC(LBR_MSR_WRITE_SUCC); + } +} + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +{ + int *fds, ncpus; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + struct kvm_vm *vm; + uint64_t r; + + TEST_REQUIRE(get_kvm_param_bool("enable_pmu")); + TEST_REQUIRE(host_cpu_is_intel); + TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION)); + + vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code); + r = run_vcpu_to_sync(vcpu); + TEST_ASSERT(r == LBR_MODE_CHECK_PASS, + "LBR format in guest PERF_CAP msr isn't correct"); + + ncpus = get_nprocs(); + fds = malloc(sizeof(int) * ncpus); + TEST_ASSERT(fds != NULL, "Failed to create fds for all cpus"); + + /* Create per cpu pinned LBR event, then it will own LBR. */ + create_perf_events(fds, ncpus, true); + + /* Since LBR is owned by per cpu pinned LBR event, guest couldn't get it, + * so guest couldn't access LBR_TOS msr. + */ + r = run_vcpu_to_sync(vcpu); + TEST_ASSERT(r == LBR_MSR_WRITE_ERROR, + "1. Unexpected successfully read/write guest LBR_TO msr"); + + release_perf_events(fds, ncpus); + + /* Since per cpu pinned event is closed and LBR is free, guest could get it, + * so guest could access LBR_TOS msr. + */ + r = run_vcpu_to_sync(vcpu); + TEST_ASSERT(r == LBR_MSR_WRITE_SUCC, + "2. Failed to read/write guest LBR_TO msr"); + + /* Create per cpu LBR event, its priority is lower than vLBR event, and it + * couldn't get LBR back from vLBR + */ + create_perf_events(fds, ncpus, false); + + /* LBR is still owned by guest, So guest could access LBR_TOS successfully. */ + r = run_vcpu_to_sync(vcpu); + TEST_ASSERT(r == LBR_MSR_WRITE_SUCC, + "3. Failed read/write guest LBR_TO msr"); + + release_perf_events(fds, ncpus); + + /* Create per cpu pinned LBR event, its priority is higher than vLBR event, + * so it will get LBR back from vLBR. + */ + create_perf_events(fds, ncpus, true); + + /* LBR is preepmted by per cpu pinned LBR event, guest couldn't access + * LBR_TOS msr. + */ + r = run_vcpu_to_sync(vcpu); + TEST_ASSERT(r == LBR_MSR_WRITE_ERROR, + "4. Unexpected successfully read/write guest LBR_TO msr"); + + release_perf_events(fds, ncpus); + + kvm_vm_free(vm); + + free(fds); + + return 0; +} -- 2.25.1