Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965558AbXJQU7a (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:59:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965356AbXJQU7F (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:59:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:43932 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965288AbXJQU7D (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:59:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:58:57 -0400 From: Rik van Riel To: "Lee Revell" Cc: lkml Subject: Re: VM question - accounting of SysV SHM Message-ID: <20071017165857.08b887e9@bree.surriel.com> In-Reply-To: <75b66ecd0710171349n2a2a5922qfc0d8bb64980a15c@mail.gmail.com> References: <75b66ecd0710171349n2a2a5922qfc0d8bb64980a15c@mail.gmail.com> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.4; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 760 Lines: 22 On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:49:07 -0400 "Lee Revell" wrote: > Sorry to ask this question on the list but I've Googled and found > nothing. > > Is system V shared memory accounted for as Cached, or as normal > application memory? Cached. Shared memory segments basically are tmpfs files. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/