Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <908bd8bd-8629-f6e4-40f9-77454d52100d@linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2023 18:10:32 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
To:     "Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini" <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com>,
        "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
        "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
        "Gomes, Vinicius" <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@linux.intel.com>,
        "Gunasekaran, Aravindhan" <aravindhan.gunasekaran@intel.com>,
        "Chilakala, Mallikarjuna" <mallikarjuna.chilakala@intel.com>
Cc:     "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kurt@linutronix.de" <kurt@linutronix.de>
References: <20230614140714.14443-1-florian.kauer@linutronix.de>
 <SJ1PR11MB6180B5C87699252B91FB7EE1B858A@SJ1PR11MB6180.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From:   Florian Kauer <florian.kauer@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] igc: Fix corner cases for TSN offload
In-Reply-To: <SJ1PR11MB6180B5C87699252B91FB7EE1B858A@SJ1PR11MB6180.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 16.06.23 17:53, Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini wrote:
>> Florian Kauer (6):
>>   igc: Rename qbv_enable to taprio_offload_enable
>>   igc: Do not enable taprio offload for invalid arguments
>>   igc: Handle already enabled taprio offload for basetime 0
>>   igc: No strict mode in pure launchtime/CBS offload
>>   igc: Fix launchtime before start of cycle
>>   igc: Fix inserting of empty frame for launchtime
> 
> All six patches, as far as I can see here, have the Fixes tag. Should they go to Net instead of Net-Next?

You are correct, these are all fixes and could go to net.
However, in its current form they will not fully apply to net 
(e.g. due to the commit 2d800bc500fb ("net/sched: taprio: replace tc_taprio_qopt_offload :: enable with a "cmd" enum")
that has overlapping code changes) and are also not tested with net. 
If you prefer to have them in net already I could send a second series.
For me personally all options (net, net-next or iwl-next) would be fine.

Thanks,
Florian