Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 17 Jun 2023 21:37:02 +0530
From:   Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
CC:     Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
        <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
        <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v8 10/18] drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper
 support
Message-ID: <ghxtdcvjaqkyu3xnsvwanevjxbucaw2qlesbm26yrk423jfxxt@epmsxqse3njs>
References: <20230223-topic-gmuwrapper-v8-0-69c68206609e@linaro.org>
 <20230223-topic-gmuwrapper-v8-10-69c68206609e@linaro.org>
 <2vr72w4tslxxumzphtuwgkcnbfjrtmw2j4qak2cukcabchadlg@spjbqoa7v4lr>
 <c5396101-ad5b-afdd-d6d7-1a2efa3b9bf7@linaro.org>
 <z5imqaxyumc5pyk4ijumjby4tswfmnjsnedeekonx5tymhwsfi@h5dk3pl2zawf>
 <68e64a35-9705-6565-3b5c-5de38419aba8@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <68e64a35-9705-6565-3b5c-5de38419aba8@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 02:00:50AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> On 16.06.2023 19:54, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:43:04PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10.06.2023 00:06, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> >>> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 03:52:29PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Some (particularly SMD_RPM, a.k.a non-RPMh) SoCs implement A6XX GPUs
> >>>> but don't implement the associated GMUs. This is due to the fact that
> >>>> the GMU directly pokes at RPMh. Sadly, this means we have to take care
> >>>> of enabling & scaling power rails, clocks and bandwidth ourselves.
> >>>>
> >>>> Reuse existing Adreno-common code and modify the deeply-GMU-infused
> >>>> A6XX code to facilitate these GPUs. This involves if-ing out lots
> >>>> of GMU callbacks and introducing a new type of GMU - GMU wrapper (it's
> >>>> the actual name that Qualcomm uses in their downstream kernels).
> >>>>
> >>>> This is essentially a register region which is convenient to model
> >>>> as a device. We'll use it for managing the GDSCs. The register
> >>>> layout matches the actual GMU_CX/GX regions on the "real GMU" devices
> >>>> and lets us reuse quite a bit of gmu_read/write/rmw calls.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
> >>>> ---
> [...]
> 
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
> >>>> +	if (ret)
> >>>> +		goto err_bulk_clk;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	/* If anything goes south, tear the GPU down piece by piece.. */
> >>>> +	if (ret) {
> >>>> +err_bulk_clk:
> >>>
> >>> Goto jump directly to another block looks odd to me. Why do you need this label
> >>> anyway?
> >> If clk_bulk_prepare_enable() fails, trying to proceed will hang the
> >> platform with unclocked accesses. We need to unwind everything that
> >> has been done up until that point, in reverse order.
> > 
> > I missed this response from you earlier.
> > 
> > But you are checking for 'ret' twice here. You will end up here even
> > if you don't jump! So "if (ret) goto err_bulk_clk;" looks
> > unnecessary.
> > 
> > -Akhil.
> Ohhh right, silly mistake on my part ;)
> 
> I already sent out a v9 since.. Please check it out and if you
> have any further comments, I'll fix this, and if not.. Perhaps I
> could fix it in an incremental patch if that revision is gtg?

Incremental patch is fine as there is no functional issue.

-Akhil.

> 
> Konrad
> > 
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> +		pm_runtime_put(gmu->gxpd);
> >>>> +		pm_runtime_put(gmu->dev);
> >>>> +		dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, NULL);
> >>>> +	}
> >>>> +err_set_opp:
> >>>
> >>> Generally, it is better to name the label based on what you do here. For
> >>> eg: "unlock_lock:".
> >> That seems to be a mixed bag all throughout the kernel, I've seen many
> >> usages of err_(what went wrong)
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Also, this function is small enough that it is better to return directly
> >>> in case of error. I think that would be more readable.
> >> Not really, adding the necessary cleanup steps in `if (ret)`
> >> blocks would roughly double the function's size.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> +	mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	if (!ret)
> >>>> +		msm_devfreq_resume(gpu);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	return ret;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static int a6xx_gmu_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>  {
> >>>>  	struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> >>>>  	struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> >>>> @@ -1720,7 +1799,40 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>  	return 0;
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>> -static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
> >>>> +static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> >>>> +	struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> >>>> +	struct a6xx_gmu *gmu = &a6xx_gpu->gmu;
> >>>> +	int i;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	trace_msm_gpu_suspend(0);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	msm_devfreq_suspend(gpu);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
> >>>
> >>> Again, is this initialized somewhere?
> >>>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	/* Drain the outstanding traffic on memory buses */
> >>>> +	a6xx_bus_clear_pending_transactions(adreno_gpu, true);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(gpu->nr_clocks, gpu->grp_clks);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	pm_runtime_put_sync(gmu->gxpd);
> >>>> +	dev_pm_opp_set_opp(&gpu->pdev->dev, NULL);
> >>>> +	pm_runtime_put_sync(gmu->dev);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	if (a6xx_gpu->shadow_bo)
> >>>> +		for (i = 0; i < gpu->nr_rings; i++)
> >>>> +			a6xx_gpu->shadow[i] = 0;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	gpu->suspend_count++;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	return 0;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static int a6xx_gmu_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
> >>>>  {
> >>>>  	struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> >>>>  	struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> >>>> @@ -1739,6 +1851,12 @@ static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
> >>>>  	return 0;
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>> +static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	*value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER);
> >>>> +	return 0;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>>  static struct msm_ringbuffer *a6xx_active_ring(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>  {
> >>>>  	struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> >>>> @@ -2004,8 +2122,8 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
> >>>>  		.set_param = adreno_set_param,
> >>>>  		.hw_init = a6xx_hw_init,
> >>>>  		.ucode_load = a6xx_ucode_load,
> >>>> -		.pm_suspend = a6xx_pm_suspend,
> >>>> -		.pm_resume = a6xx_pm_resume,
> >>>> +		.pm_suspend = a6xx_gmu_pm_suspend,
> >>>> +		.pm_resume = a6xx_gmu_pm_resume,
> >>>>  		.recover = a6xx_recover,
> >>>>  		.submit = a6xx_submit,
> >>>>  		.active_ring = a6xx_active_ring,
> >>>> @@ -2020,6 +2138,35 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
> >>>>  #if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
> >>>>  		.gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get,
> >>>>  		.gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,
> >>>> +#endif
> >>>> +		.create_address_space = a6xx_create_address_space,
> >>>> +		.create_private_address_space = a6xx_create_private_address_space,
> >>>> +		.get_rptr = a6xx_get_rptr,
> >>>> +		.progress = a6xx_progress,
> >>>> +	},
> >>>> +	.get_timestamp = a6xx_gmu_get_timestamp,
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs_gmuwrapper = {
> >>>> +	.base = {
> >>>> +		.get_param = adreno_get_param,
> >>>> +		.set_param = adreno_set_param,
> >>>> +		.hw_init = a6xx_hw_init,
> >>>> +		.ucode_load = a6xx_ucode_load,
> >>>> +		.pm_suspend = a6xx_pm_suspend,
> >>>> +		.pm_resume = a6xx_pm_resume,
> >>>> +		.recover = a6xx_recover,
> >>>> +		.submit = a6xx_submit,
> >>>> +		.active_ring = a6xx_active_ring,
> >>>> +		.irq = a6xx_irq,
> >>>> +		.destroy = a6xx_destroy,
> >>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
> >>>> +		.show = a6xx_show,
> >>>> +#endif
> >>>> +		.gpu_busy = a6xx_gpu_busy,
> >>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
> >>>> +		.gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get,
> >>>> +		.gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,
> >>>>  #endif
> >>>>  		.create_address_space = a6xx_create_address_space,
> >>>>  		.create_private_address_space = a6xx_create_private_address_space,
> >>>> @@ -2050,15 +2197,31 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> >>>>  
> >>>>  	adreno_gpu->registers = NULL;
> >>>>  
> >>>> +	/* Check if there is a GMU phandle and set it up */
> >>>> +	node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,gmu", 0);
> >>>> +	/* FIXME: How do we gracefully handle this? */
> >>>> +	BUG_ON(!node);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	adreno_gpu->gmu_is_wrapper = of_device_is_compatible(node, "qcom,adreno-gmu-wrapper");
> >>>> +
> >>>>  	/*
> >>>>  	 * We need to know the platform type before calling into adreno_gpu_init
> >>>>  	 * so that the hw_apriv flag can be correctly set. Snoop into the info
> >>>>  	 * and grab the revision number
> >>>>  	 */
> >>>>  	info = adreno_info(config->rev);
> >>>> -
> >>>> -	if (info && (info->revn == 650 || info->revn == 660 ||
> >>>> -			adreno_cmp_rev(ADRENO_REV(6, 3, 5, ANY_ID), info->rev)))
> >>>> +	if (!info)
> >>>> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	/* Assign these early so that we can use the is_aXYZ helpers */
> >>>> +	/* Numeric revision IDs (e.g. 630) */
> >>>> +	adreno_gpu->revn = info->revn;
> >>>> +	/* New-style ADRENO_REV()-only */
> >>>> +	adreno_gpu->rev = info->rev;
> >>>> +	/* Quirk data */
> >>>> +	adreno_gpu->info = info;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a660_family(adreno_gpu))
> >>>>  		adreno_gpu->base.hw_apriv = true;
> >>>>  
> >>>>  	a6xx_llc_slices_init(pdev, a6xx_gpu);
> >>>> @@ -2069,7 +2232,10 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> >>>>  		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >>>>  	}
> >>>>  
> >>>> -	ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs, 1);
> >>>> +	if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
> >>>> +		ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs_gmuwrapper, 1);
> >>>> +	else
> >>>> +		ret = adreno_gpu_init(dev, pdev, adreno_gpu, &funcs, 1);
> >>>>  	if (ret) {
> >>>>  		a6xx_destroy(&(a6xx_gpu->base.base));
> >>>>  		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >>>> @@ -2082,13 +2248,10 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> >>>>  	if (adreno_is_a618(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_7c3(adreno_gpu))
> >>>>  		priv->gpu_clamp_to_idle = true;
> >>>>  
> >>>> -	/* Check if there is a GMU phandle and set it up */
> >>>> -	node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,gmu", 0);
> >>>> -
> >>>> -	/* FIXME: How do we gracefully handle this? */
> >>>> -	BUG_ON(!node);
> >>>> -
> >>>> -	ret = a6xx_gmu_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
> >>>> +	if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
> >>>> +		ret = a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
> >>>> +	else
> >>>> +		ret = a6xx_gmu_init(a6xx_gpu, node);
> >>>>  	of_node_put(node);
> >>>>  	if (ret) {
> >>>>  		a6xx_destroy(&(a6xx_gpu->base.base));
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
> >>>> index aa70390ee1c6..c788b06e72da 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.h
> >>>> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ int a6xx_gmu_set_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state);
> >>>>  void a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state);
> >>>>  
> >>>>  int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node);
> >>>> +int a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node);
> >>>>  void a6xx_gmu_remove(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu);
> >>>>  
> >>>>  void a6xx_gmu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct dev_pm_opp *opp,
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
> >>>> index 30ecdff363e7..4e5d650578c6 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c
> >>>> @@ -1041,16 +1041,18 @@ struct msm_gpu_state *a6xx_gpu_state_get(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>  	/* Get the generic state from the adreno core */
> >>>>  	adreno_gpu_state_get(gpu, &a6xx_state->base);
> >>>>  
> >>>> -	a6xx_get_gmu_registers(gpu, a6xx_state);
> >>>> +	if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
> >>>> +		a6xx_get_gmu_registers(gpu, a6xx_state);
> >>>>  
> >>>> -	a6xx_state->gmu_log = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.log);
> >>>> -	a6xx_state->gmu_hfi = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.hfi);
> >>>> -	a6xx_state->gmu_debug = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.debug);
> >>>> +		a6xx_state->gmu_log = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.log);
> >>>> +		a6xx_state->gmu_hfi = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.hfi);
> >>>> +		a6xx_state->gmu_debug = a6xx_snapshot_gmu_bo(a6xx_state, &a6xx_gpu->gmu.debug);
> >>>>  /
> >>>> -	a6xx_snapshot_gmu_hfi_history(gpu, a6xx_state);
> >>>> +		a6xx_snapshot_gmu_hfi_history(gpu, a6xx_state);
> >>>> +	}
> >>>>  
> >>>>  	/* If GX isn't on the rest of the data isn't going to be accessible */
> >>>> -	if (!a6xx_gmu_gx_is_on(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
> >>>> +	if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) && !a6xx_gmu_gx_is_on(&a6xx_gpu->gmu))
> >>>>  		return &a6xx_state->base;
> >>>>  
> >>>>  	/* Get the banks of indexed registers */
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> >>>> index 6934cee07d42..5c5901d65950 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> >>>> @@ -528,6 +528,10 @@ int adreno_load_fw(struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu)
> >>>>  		if (!adreno_gpu->info->fw[i])
> >>>>  			continue;
> >>>>  
> >>>> +		/* Skip loading GMU firwmare with GMU Wrapper */
> >>>> +		if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) && i == ADRENO_FW_GMU)
> >>>> +			continue;
> >>>> +
> >>>>  		/* Skip if the firmware has already been loaded */
> >>>>  		if (adreno_gpu->fw[i])
> >>>>  			continue;
> >>>> @@ -1074,8 +1078,8 @@ int adreno_gpu_init(struct drm_device *drm, struct platform_device *pdev,
> >>>>  	u32 speedbin;
> >>>>  	int ret;
> >>>>  
> >>>> -	/* Only handle the core clock when GMU is not in use */
> >>>> -	if (config->rev.core < 6) {
> >>>> +	/* Only handle the core clock when GMU is not in use (or is absent). */
> >>>> +	if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) || config->rev.core < 6) {
> >>>>  		/*
> >>>>  		 * This can only be done before devm_pm_opp_of_add_table(), or
> >>>>  		 * dev_pm_opp_set_config() will WARN_ON()
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
> >>>> index f62612a5c70f..ee5352bc5329 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
> >>>> @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ struct adreno_gpu {
> >>>>  	 * code (a3xx_gpu.c) and stored in this common location.
> >>>>  	 */
> >>>>  	const unsigned int *reg_offsets;
> >>>> +	bool gmu_is_wrapper;
> >>>>  };
> >>>>  #define to_adreno_gpu(x) container_of(x, struct adreno_gpu, base)
> >>>>  
> >>>> @@ -145,6 +146,11 @@ struct adreno_platform_config {
> >>>>  
> >>>>  bool adreno_cmp_rev(struct adreno_rev rev1, struct adreno_rev rev2);
> >>>>  
> >>>> +static inline bool adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	return gpu->gmu_is_wrapper;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>>  static inline bool adreno_is_a2xx(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>  {
> >>>>  	return (gpu->revn < 300);
> >>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> 2.40.1
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I am still not fully onboard with the idea of gmu_wrapper node in devicetree.
> >>> Aside from that, I don't see any other issue. Please check the few comments I left.
> >> Thanks for your review!
> >>
> >> Konrad
> >>>
> >>> -Akhil.
> >>>