Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762680AbXJRCV0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:21:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754358AbXJRCVT (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:21:19 -0400 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:33412 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750780AbXJRCVS (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:21:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:21:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Casey Schaufler cc: Thomas Fricaccia , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LSM conversion to static interface In-Reply-To: <900019.22422.qm@web36607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <900019.22422.qm@web36607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 743 Lines: 21 On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > The in-tree vs out-of-tree discussion is independent of LSM. Indeed. I think there is certainly likely to be some small overlap, but I *think* they are largely independent issues - "do we want choice in securitu models" (a very emphatic YES as far as I'm concerned) vs "do we necessarily want to do them as out-of-tree modules" (I'd like people who actually *do* things like that to educate us on why and what they are doing). Hmm? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/