Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:40:30 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To:     Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>,
        linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 0/3] leds: trigger: netdev: add additional
 modes
Message-ID: <20230619104030.GB1472962@google.com>
References: <20230617115355.22868-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20230617115355.22868-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023, Christian Marangi wrote:

> This is a continue of [1]. It was decided to take a more gradual
> approach to implement LEDs support for switch and phy starting with
> basic support and then implementing the hw control part when we have all
> the prereq done.
> 
> This should be the final part for the netdev trigger.
> I added net-next tag and added netdev mailing list since I was informed
> that this should be merged with netdev branch.
> 
> We collect some info around and we found a good set of modes that are
> common in almost all the PHY and Switch.
> 
> These modes are:
> - Modes for dedicated link speed(10, 100, 1000 mbps). Additional mode
>   can be added later following this example.
> - Modes for half and full duplex.
> 
> The original idea was to add hw control only modes.
> While the concept makes sense in practice it would results in lots of 
> additional code and extra check to make sure we are setting correct modes.
> 
> With the suggestion from Andrew it was pointed out that using the ethtool
> APIs we can actually get the current link speed and duplex and this
> effectively removed the problem of having hw control only modes since we
> can fallback to software.
> 
> Since these modes are supported by software, we can skip providing an
> user for this in the LED driver to support hw control for these new modes
> (that will come right after this is merged) and prevent this to be another
> multi subsystem series.
> 
> For link speed and duplex we use ethtool APIs.
> 
> To call ethtool APIs, rtnl lock is needed but this can be skipped on
> handling netdev events as the lock is already held.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230216013230.22978-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com/
> 
> Changes v4:
> - Add net-next tag
> - Add additional patch to expose hw_control via sysfs
> - CC netdev mailing list
> Changes v3:
> - Add Andrew review tag
> - Use SPEED_UNKNOWN to init link_speed
> - Fix using HALF_DUPLEX as duplex init and use DUPLEX_UNKNOWN instead
> Changes v2:
> - Drop ACTIVITY patch as it can be handled internally in the LED driver
> - Reduce duplicate code and move the link state to a dedicated helper
> 
> Christian Marangi (3):
>   leds: trigger: netdev: add additional specific link speed mode
>   leds: trigger: netdev: add additional specific link duplex mode
>   leds: trigger: netdev: expose hw_control status via sysfs
> 
>  drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  include/linux/leds.h                  |   5 ++
>  2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Seeing as we're on -rc7 already, any reason why we shouldn't hold off
and simply apply these against LEDs once v6.5 is released?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]