Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230616035813.255062-1-jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
 <165dd295-1b3a-5062-772a-613a7bf6fd45@linaro.org> <CAJe_ZhdV3yaKUVD43duO4hkGMByJhq7x9bN+eBXJdBXdxgDneg@mail.gmail.com>
 <e2b98d80-8e9a-6083-3bc5-677bef0d3263@linaro.org> <CAJe_ZhfeYmxjR7Hcht0F9rc97VG2JCFEEFB+S5kUhSCmsut3Cg@mail.gmail.com>
 <661800ab-c363-49f2-4889-c458a7b298c4@linaro.org> <CAJe_Zhe9CKNC_B6y_YxEY_Nz765GQghg1ivYSOROJH8A7FKcnA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1531062a-ce5f-8af0-b569-1b9eac3e7eac@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <1531062a-ce5f-8af0-b569-1b9eac3e7eac@linaro.org>
From:   Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2023 14:17:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJe_Zhct9KGVD1t9CTaFhL05oxa9Rawf5g1OVmWOd-NYVNAErA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: socionext: add bindings for the
 Synquacer platform
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
        ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, masahisa.kojima@linaro.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 at 02:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 17/06/2023 01:18, Jassi Brar wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 15:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 16/06/2023 22:06, Jassi Brar wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 11:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >>> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 16/06/2023 18:23, Jassi Brar wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 05:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >>>>> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 16/06/2023 05:58, jaswinder.singh@linaro.org wrote:
> >>>>>>> From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Socionext's DeveloperBox is based on the SC2A11B SoC (Synquacer).
> >>>>>>> Specify bindings for the platform and boards based on that.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The
> >>>>>> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> I can remove it, but I see many mentions like "Fix bindings for"  "Add
> >>>>> binding for" etc in the subject line.
> >>>>
> >>>> Can we fix them as well?
> >>>>
> >>> ??
> >> What else I can say to such argument?
> >>
> > It was not an argument, I agreed to remove it. I just observed that
> > the nit-pick was arbitrary.
> > And frankly
> >    "dt-bindings: arm: socionext: add Synquacer"   is as misleading as
> >    "dt-bindings: arm: socionext: add bindings for the Synquacer"   is improper.
>
> "add Synquacer boards"
> it is both precise and correct. No misleading.
>
Ok. I am going to do that. Are you going to enforce this practice for
all submissions in future?


> >>
> >> Bindings without user (so no DTSI and no driver)? Just few, not countless.
> >>
> > I disagree. But I don't have time to write a script to find
> > compatibles/enums and properties in yaml/txt files that are not in any
> > dts/dtsi file.
> >  By that logic synquacer's spi/netsec/i2c/exiu bindings and drivers in
> > kernel are illegit too?
>
> Don't know which one you talk about.
>
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
  {
     i2c/socionext,synquacer-i2c.yaml
     interrupt-controller/socionext,synquacer-exiu.yaml
     net/socionext,synquacer-netsec.yaml
     spi/socionext,synquacer-spi.yaml
   }
and corresponding code in drivers/


> > The synquacer dts/dtsi are in u-boot upstream. SR testsuite looks up
>
> Sure, can you point it? U-Boot upstream is a valid project. Just like
> many other upstream ones.
>
Location of dts/dtsi in u-boot upstream is
     https://elixir.bootlin.com/u-boot/latest/source/arch/arm/dts
see { synquacer-sc2a11-caches.dtsi     synquacer-sc2a11.dtsi
synquacer-sc2a11-developerbox-u-boot.dtsi
synquacer-sc2a11-developerbox.dts }

regards.