Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2023 15:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:     Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] riscv: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
In-Reply-To: <mhng-41a06775-95dc-4747-aaab-2c5c83fd6422@palmer-ri-x1c9>
CC:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
To:     jszhang@kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Message-ID: <mhng-57559277-afaa-4a85-a3ad-b9be6dba737f@palmer-ri-x1c9>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 06:54:33 PDT (-0700), Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:25:49 PDT (-0700), jszhang@kernel.org wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 07:49:17AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> On Tue, 23 May 2023 09:54:58 PDT (-0700), jszhang@kernel.org wrote:
>>> > When trying to run linux with various opensource riscv core on
>>> > resource limited FPGA platforms, for example, those FPGAs with less
>>> > than 16MB SDRAM, I want to save mem as much as possible. One of the
>>> > major technologies is kernel size optimizations, I found that riscv
>>> > does not currently support HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION, which
>>> > passes -fdata-sections, -ffunction-sections to CFLAGS and passes the
>>> > --gc-sections flag to the linker.
>>> >
>>> > This not only benefits my case on FPGA but also benefits defconfigs.
>>> > Here are some notable improvements from enabling this with defconfigs:
>>> >
>>> > nommu_k210_defconfig:
>>> >    text    data     bss     dec     hex
>>> > 1112009  410288   59837 1582134  182436     before
>>> >  962838  376656   51285 1390779  1538bb     after
>>> >
>>> > rv32_defconfig:
>>> >    text    data     bss     dec     hex
>>> > 8804455 2816544  290577 11911576 b5c198     before
>>> > 8692295 2779872  288977 11761144 b375f8     after
>>> >
>>> > defconfig:
>>> >    text    data     bss     dec     hex
>>> > 9438267 3391332  485333 13314932 cb2b74     before
>>> > 9285914 3350052  483349 13119315 c82f53     after
>>> >
>>> > patch1 and patch2 are clean ups.
>>> > patch3 fixes a typo.
>>> > patch4 finally enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION for riscv.
>>> >
>>> > NOTE: Zhangjin Wu firstly sent out a patch to enable dead code
>>> > elimination for riscv several months ago, I didn't notice it until
>>> > yesterday. Although it missed some preparations and some sections's
>>> > keeping, he is the first person to enable this feature for riscv. To
>>> > ease merging, this series take his patch into my entire series and
>>> > makes patch4 authored by him after getting his ack to reflect
>>> > the above fact.
>>> >
>>> > Since v1:
>>> >   - collect Reviewed-by, Tested-by tag
>>> >   - Make patch4 authored by Zhangjin Wu, add my co-developed-by tag
>>> >
>>> > Jisheng Zhang (3):
>>> >   riscv: move options to keep entries sorted
>>> >   riscv: vmlinux-xip.lds.S: remove .alternative section
>>> >   vmlinux.lds.h: use correct .init.data.* section name
>>> >
>>> > Zhangjin Wu (1):
>>> >   riscv: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
>>> >
>>> >  arch/riscv/Kconfig                  |  13 +-
>>> >  arch/riscv/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S |   6 -
>>> >  arch/riscv/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S     |   6 +-
>>> >  include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h   |   2 +-
>>> >  4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Do you have a base commit for this?  It's not applying to 6.4-rc1 and the
>>> patchwork bot couldn't find one either.
>>
>> Hi Palmer,
>>
>> Commit 3b90b09af5be ("riscv: Fix orphan section warnings caused by
>> kernel/pi") touches vmlinux.lds.S, so to make the merge easy, this
>> series is based on 6.4-rc2.
>
> Thanks.

Sorry to be so slow here, but I think this is causing LLD to hang on 
allmodconfig.  I'm still getting to the bottom of it, there's a few 
other things I have in flight still.

>
>>
>> Thanks