Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Feedback-ID: i58a146ae:Fastmail
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:54:37 +1000 (AEST)
From:   Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Linux Contribution Maturity Model and
 the wider community
In-Reply-To: <202306191247.3CA085BA64@keescook>
Message-ID: <7f26d19e-2aed-c03f-e59c-c36164cdfb19@linux-m68k.org>
References: <cd1786eadd1ff05d9ca053b72eb5f06ceb0c470d.1687167717.git.fthain@linux-m68k.org> <202306191247.3CA085BA64@keescook>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="-1463811774-526003913-1687231289=:26354"
Content-ID: <f58cfba7-0db2-e714-a931-aa5b02c72b9e@nippy.intranet>
Precedence: bulk

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

---1463811774-526003913-1687231289=:26354
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Content-ID: <833f7255-6cf7-1760-8087-49cb24a6c819@nippy.intranet>

On Mon, 19 Jun 2023, Kees Cook wrote:

> > @@ -103,7 +103,6 @@ Level 5
> > =20
> >  * Upstream kernel development is considered a formal job position, wit=
h
> >    at least a third of the engineer=E2=80=99s time spent doing Upstream=
 Work.
> > -* Organizations will actively seek out community member feedback as a
> > -  factor in official performance reviews.
>=20
> This really cannot be dropped -- companies must factor upstream work=20
> into performance reviews or it will continue to be seen as "free time"=20
> work, and employees won't be recognized for their upstream=20
> contributions. If an org has no perf reviews, this item is already=20
> nullified, IMO.
>=20

I believe that I've now addressed this in my reply to Greg.
---1463811774-526003913-1687231289=:26354--