Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <eea945ce-9b9e-42d6-0387-48ec0c88cc89@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2023 08:54:31 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] dt-bindings: media: platform: visconti: Add
 Toshiba Visconti Video Input Interface bindings
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@toshiba.co.jp>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Cc:     linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230620031111.3776-1-yuji2.ishikawa@toshiba.co.jp>
 <20230620031111.3776-2-yuji2.ishikawa@toshiba.co.jp>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230620031111.3776-2-yuji2.ishikawa@toshiba.co.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 20/06/2023 05:11, Yuji Ishikawa wrote:
> Adds the Device Tree binding documentation that allows to describe
> the Video Input Interface found in Toshiba Visconti SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@toshiba.co.jp>
> Reviewed-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
> ---
> Changelog v2:
> - no change
> 
> Changelog v3:
> - no change
> 
> Changelog v4:
> - fix style problems at the v3 patch
> - remove "index" member
> - update example
> 
> Changelog v5:
> - no change
> 
> Changelog v6:
> - add register definition of BUS-IF and MPU

You ignored the comments from v4->v5. I pointed this out. You still
ignored them.

You keep sending the same wrong patch ignoring review. This is not
acceptable.

NAK

Best regards,
Krzysztof