Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:10:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:10:46 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:58642 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:10:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 14:10:19 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Alan Cox Cc: war , , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Limits broken in 2.4.x kernel. In-Reply-To: <200112181459.fBIExrW15830@pinkpanther.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > would be limited to 3 processes. > > > > I was curious if this fix would ever be merged into the Linux Kernel so > > limits would actually work properly? > > Linus kept rejecting it. Now we have Marcelo as 2.4.x maintainer I'll > look at submitting it. 2.5 will no doubt stay broken for a while. One of the things to remember for when marcelo takes over 2.6, I guess ;) Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/