Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp8002024rwd; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 08:56:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6VX1JhkXsP9UqDNGX4JtZChLmSz/jWRg6AKRFficr6SqLOqhp8dAiGETHhPZ77ayDE+ov2 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:13c8:b0:39a:5cc0:ce61 with SMTP id d8-20020a05680813c800b0039a5cc0ce61mr17328422oiw.29.1687276574629; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 08:56:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1687276574; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Lk5wk4eGrbCHPsrYH+BAthEmGtnXN3nmzyY8ODmRQk6k2uUA7xpo/HGz7NFWSX17NG +/9lLeVSkwQur3VOtR0NTFH1hHNxsZ385w02+VZoeoneun8deOKo/lsd2N3pKj3TddTA ghSxyPK/VKc+0EKi/7BWtg4yd5ea0Qhdw34XZM1zzmDmgmRwNN71wAaqwtzpy0vtfS/2 21kQLTM/lfjG/TEu578OIXzTJ3feKgeJ63JFHrY2tXZ/VmoIhuExE3+xUtvgcT5HRuba 7DAfuO4/+6A0cvwJLjskG9CNgRI8NUnqeWc0cziA80gLiHn0cFL1tPpbkrcxYNHLl2s9 bRbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=XZoVwu4hIqDQzHqV+Gj1W6GnEQAv2Ed0+LCbMmaFexA=; b=MLHH70/w0aO30LV+kFdaepseojds7wHD0FLAzju514qb9omaSyFEq98fST4psH5mRT /qtIUple7RCLv656pNdEBbnm0SCZJKVi6kiFHr+rwW0knQU+G+J94GbQknfS8d0ocAEF Yfy1mI1S5KaGd81ZZoTjhNZeFh8TDkZO0tn56d0DOJ446+4EsPivX+DrBSMNb2Pq7Vbu oDqLbkj0bXrQj0SCKC0daMWkpmfQPL2ECEBZWeBWq9DHm4H9MguFMzZEQXZ6fqACD/10 8SHqPptt4ZIrjZiEg2W+tofUPdrXofEl34ROKTVkI8v4CwkBwcM0hcmABtMUPmi+FTyL 9xWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@hugovil.com header.s=x header.b=H6yl6MkD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z11-20020a170903018b00b001b546440895si2565921plg.72.2023.06.20.08.56.00; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 08:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@hugovil.com header.s=x header.b=H6yl6MkD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229952AbjFTPmU (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:42:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33162 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229638AbjFTPmT (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:42:19 -0400 Received: from mail.hugovil.com (mail.hugovil.com [162.243.120.170]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B415197; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 08:42:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hugovil.com ; s=x; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=XZoVwu4hIqDQzHqV+Gj1W6GnEQAv2Ed0+LCbMmaFexA=; b=H6yl6MkDNEPSxcb2QhHCiUtO7F xyzSZ59xIWcpJGbkIgbYWMWtaLDYjneHOFyAHW/kHQ/OzBHrZaxh/rICBW9Ngi7dMq6ugnH+TCPNA 3/fIYNMwWI9E+ICf0XoHRbbgwIcNLCDV1y9c7+GdG9OU/V2QmpkTpYeLW306S3pE+FlA=; Received: from modemcable061.19-161-184.mc.videotron.ca ([184.161.19.61]:51064 helo=pettiford) by mail.hugovil.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qBdUg-000117-Et; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:42:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:42:09 -0400 From: Hugo Villeneuve To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Greg KH , robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, jringle@gridpoint.com, tomasz.mon@camlingroup.com, l.perczak@camlintechnologies.com, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Hugo Villeneuve , stable@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <20230620114209.fb5272ad8cf5c5e2895d68b1@hugovil.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20230602152626.284324-1-hugo@hugovil.com> <20230602152626.284324-6-hugo@hugovil.com> <2023060454-cotton-paramount-e33e@gregkh> <20230604134459.3c3844012e9714fa2a61e642@hugovil.com> <20230620100846.d58436efc061fb91074fa7e5@hugovil.com> <20230620113312.882d8f0c7d5603b1c93f33fb@hugovil.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 184.161.19.61 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: hugo@hugovil.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] serial: sc16is7xx: fix regression with GPIO configuration X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.hugovil.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:35:48 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 6:33 PM Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 18:18:12 +0300 > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 5:08 PM Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > > > On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 22:31:04 +0300 > > > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > ... > > > > > did you have a chance to look at V8 (sent two weks ago) which fixed all > > > > of what we discussed? > > > > > > The patch 6 already has my tag, anything specific you want me to do? > > > > Hi Andy, > > I forgot to remove your "Reviewed-by: Andy..." tag before sending V8 > > since there were some changes involved in patch 6 and I wanted you to > > review them. Can you confirm if the changes are correct? > > > > I also added a new patch "remove obsolete out_thread label". It has no > > real impact on the code generation itself, but maybe you can review and > > confirm if tags are ok or not, based on commit message and also > > additional commit message. > > Both are fine to me. Hi, Ok, thank you for reviewing this. I guess now we are good to go with this series if the stable tags and patches order are good after Greg's review? Hugo.