Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:53:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:52:52 -0500 Received: from e23.nc.us.ibm.com ([32.97.136.229]:37553 "EHLO outside") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:52:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 08:50:59 -0800 From: Mike Kravetz To: Alan Cox Cc: Linus Torvalds , Rik van Riel , Davide Libenzi , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Scheduler ( was: Just a second ) ... Message-ID: <20011218085059.A1176@w-mikek2.des.beaverton.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 02:09:16PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 02:09:16PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > The scheduler is eating 40-60% of the machine on real world 8 cpu workloads. > That isn't going to go away by sticking heads in sand. Can you be more specific as to the workload you are referring to? As someone who has been playing with the scheduler for a while, I am interested in all such workloads. -- Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/