Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp9385311rwd;
        Wed, 21 Jun 2023 06:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7L7tBcl34cIZmjVNkFQOB6yAkTuS510o2ctwZcFGjoZ4/APy/g9K1jWvUXTqolexa/vw6e
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:11cf:b0:25e:df16:892a with SMTP id gv15-20020a17090b11cf00b0025edf16892amr7049898pjb.34.1687355655417;
        Wed, 21 Jun 2023 06:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1687355655; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=uvuqazTunnV3WkvFle79Ym1jQVy33rw3TKJ3yjIDjw2k7iboLewOZkmj1UnWyhqIYT
         Z4VgC8ZOHX/173bUtJc6H2y8xYTgXn2jdWx2AhcWvA5p21/XZQCgq4ZKJjGW600N8tkI
         nynvhFVsdIca/Z53ENcn6iCD20QiSfJOyfO8aXtE9u/FM+30t0B66WPW5B2vypNiN0wA
         Ss/uhs3QjpoKl5mp7QExSyzLiG/pe6c/wBqrKTUugCqywtWo0EKmm+ayayY7aPH6IWBz
         1ND6fZsHxuh0mOzzruO0X7n6hJzpvvZu85StmplUJUjKQRG5yecaddmm70VlJnm9Wiz8
         KoFA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version
         :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature;
        bh=+QGGwskwhPn00hT9mtWzuJCNmFQuZuyzTCjvx27Ee38=;
        b=LhvYOP2ZkuP5qoKmRtuhw+0mRlvTGzlHi6FGHRc4tz73XAdqyV/2rFeAQg+1pruiOC
         eJctwZbuhbOWKUsXyGAjqk3Gaa6rFcoxr6r4ucBpxPcwTbn4euQDP6hISZTgCIaB3r2Z
         Ze78AiLI+PMywK53uEsbtkUV0C9DlI1uLp1gLymEgnKxoCRjLYpkemNWJixyzLlC+LtC
         Yg+eMGsOsM25mIxAXD7lXHt+0XPlGWt0nkqRJegv5rm2VxkUd9t0CvAKcv9MG6C2L/b9
         BvpWidFCd8ZJYieqIyDQXpp+6kpapNWoqY7QJ6GUSjmC/kVFSoduNOVGqEcVfRy/tvhr
         xl3Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=CJwTo2Vd;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cu18-20020a17090afa9200b0025bf39495d5si998661pjb.35.2023.06.21.06.54.01;
        Wed, 21 Jun 2023 06:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=CJwTo2Vd;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S231896AbjFUNdz (ORCPT <rfc822;ajhmls@gmail.com> + 99 others);
        Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:33:55 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33176 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S231478AbjFUNdx (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:33:53 -0400
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AE34191;
        Wed, 21 Jun 2023 06:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
  d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel;
  t=1687354433; x=1718890433;
  h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:
   mime-version:in-reply-to;
  bh=UGeph0SnmhqYhiHgSmqDullZqGhaZth9Yn0Kr+BwwTs=;
  b=CJwTo2VdYTY/LYqO4uUZnMcIYItGJW2cy0CiSA+YJvXxMZ1fnEsPBWLT
   l+ZEeaZnWOTaUCtg3/XQEaVGCyHQxOXRMEvGzhRJgnZEUW//AbzApxWUq
   KNrC6mxZ+VA612fff7IFzlOSYxjZbrWv1gjTE4d44TS608ivD8m7jeTZC
   fD/U2zR35LphoV4JQ86QCdfO8UVxEK7DwjzASAZTI9vBwstKjt2lsADI0
   tvtl4T5JZXvbnNVnPyuLaKLIIBKcdrYp7CulEAq0lqTXaNHJIGrGPDqzq
   C+3zeUuqGVrRBmZkOXqeoQ07S+1fjpKaCww9y6jSmr811DBqtO0bUmHx7
   w==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10747"; a="359041977"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,260,1681196400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="359041977"
Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48])
  by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jun 2023 06:33:52 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10748"; a="784502088"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,260,1681196400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="784502088"
Received: from araj-dh-work.jf.intel.com (HELO araj-dh-work) ([10.165.157.158])
  by fmsmga004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jun 2023 06:33:52 -0700
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2023 06:32:13 -0700
From:   Ashok Raj <ashok_raj@linux.intel.com>
To:     linan666@huaweicloud.com
Cc:     axboe@kernel.dk, linan122@huawei.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
        vishal.l.verma@intel.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com,
        yi.zhang@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] block/badblocks: fix badblocks setting error
Message-ID: <ZJL73Zhyq4d/oaXd@araj-dh-work>
References: <20230621172052.1499919-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230621172052.1499919-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
        DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,
        SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham
        autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 01:20:48AM +0800, linan666@huaweicloud.com wrote:
> From: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
> 
> This patch series fixes some simple bugs of setting badblocks and
> optimizing struct badblocks. Coly Li has been trying to refactor badblocks
> in patch series "badblocks improvement for multiple bad block ranges", but
> the workload is significant. Before that, I will fix some easily triggered
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You mean the refactor is going to take longer to complete? 
If so, maybe state it that way...