Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230619082036.410-1-lidong@vivo.com> <CAM9d7chHMH-uJryUVBYZ6emrGLVH8Huc5frDz4YqG7TU29G-6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+JHD93f_c8OJf4Kg68C_Xo=_rcO669G0QJ_mjL78upLmUwfoA@mail.gmail.com> <CAM9d7cj-t-jko=7mBb_dLrXFCC7s03W0Jz7jrO4nZkWZKeJAAA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7cj-t-jko=7mBb_dLrXFCC7s03W0Jz7jrO4nZkWZKeJAAA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:26:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cj0HLf1YSu+Y1GbhfR_yxtS2UDGtAuPbOAQhiCwCuF9nA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: Fix incorrect calculation of object size by sizeof
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Cc:     Li Dong <lidong@vivo.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        "open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM" 
        <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM" 
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, opensource.kernel@vivo.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:42 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Arnaldo,
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 3:06 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023, 3:19 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 1:21 AM Li Dong <lidong@vivo.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > What we need to calculate is the size of the object, not the size of the
> >> > pointer.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Li Dong <lidong@vivo.com>
> >>
> >> Since this problem was introduced in the current dev cycle and not in the
> >> mainline yet, I think we can skip the Fixes tag.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> >
> >
> > I think we should have it anyway, if not for the stable guys to pick it up, for documentation sake :-)
>
> Ok, I'll add that.  Thanks for the reply while on your vacation. :)

Applied to perf-tools-next with the below tag, thanks!

Fixed: 51cfe7a3e87e ("perf python: Avoid 2 leak sanitizer issues")