Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
        npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
        dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] cpu/SMT: Move SMT prototypes into cpu_smt.h
In-Reply-To: <20230615154635.13660-2-ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20230615154635.13660-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
 <20230615154635.13660-2-ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:51:29 +0200
Message-ID: <87o7l77ucu.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 15 2023 at 17:46, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
>
> A subsequent patch would like to use the cpuhp_smt_control enum as part
> of the interface between generic and arch code.

This still has the 'patch' and 'arch' style which I pointed out
before. It seems you fixed it only for one patch in the series.

Thanks,

        tglx