Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2023 15:19:14 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To:     Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
CC:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>,
        Song Shuai <songshuaishuai@tinylab.org>,
        <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Documentation: riscv: Add early boot document
Message-ID: <20230622-ensnare-catnap-1d1183111387@wendy>
References: <20230621072234.9900-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
 <20230621072234.9900-2-alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
 <20230621-attempt-unstirred-567b0352176a@wendy>
 <CAHVXubhJXUODDnfRJAzAKcutMvz_amP3wAf+4QBKxXzcd_r7Yg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9ZbHIYccJ4yhuuFy"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHVXubhJXUODDnfRJAzAKcutMvz_amP3wAf+4QBKxXzcd_r7Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

--9ZbHIYccJ4yhuuFy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 02:26:02PM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:15=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microc=
hip.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Alex,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 09:22:33AM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > > This document describes the constraints and requirements of the early
> > > boot process in a RISC-V kernel.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for writing this & implementing the feedback :)
> > I had one or two minor comments about rather long sentences, but there's
>=20
> Arf, sorry, which one? So that I can fix that in case of a v3.

> > little point I think in respinning for that, so I have ignored them.

Nah, not worth the effort ;)

> > Other than that, didn't spot anything new on this second reading.
> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Conor.

--9ZbHIYccJ4yhuuFy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZJRYYgAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0sOtAP4pFW6UOJGC/EkvVCkSSQbfq8gdLRnDTGVDOZ4wEJhvjAD/bXQ665m1ulNR
kjSwM6etTh4yJbDKoTALymORyEIu+w4=
=c0MV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9ZbHIYccJ4yhuuFy--