Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:40:07 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc:     "Lin, Meng-Bo" <linmengbo0689@protonmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: qcom: Document new msm8916-samsung
 devices
Message-ID: <20230622144007.GA1662197-robh@kernel.org>
References: <20230622000007.48219-1-linmengbo0689@protonmail.com>
 <20230622000254.48260-1-linmengbo0689@protonmail.com>
 <e66f1431-a4fd-07f8-6d34-5f6a358a361a@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e66f1431-a4fd-07f8-6d34-5f6a358a361a@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:31:24AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/06/2023 02:03, Lin, Meng-Bo wrote:
> > Document the new following device tree bindings used in their
> > device trees:
> > 
> > - samsung,fortuna3g
> > - samsung,fortunaltezt
> > - samsung,gprimeltecan
> > - samsung,grandprimelte
> > - samsung,heatqlte
> > - samsung,rossa
> 
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> and lists to CC.  It might happen, that command when run on an older
> kernel, gives you outdated entries.  Therefore please be sure you base
> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
> 
> You missed at least DT list (maybe more), so this won't be tested by our
> tools. Performing review on untested code might be a waste of time, thus
> I will skip this patch entirely till you follow the process allowing the
> patch to be tested.
> 
> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
> 
> You just ignored maintainers entirely... It's not even about testing but
> no one would apply it.

Something strange going on with this one as it still made it to the DT 
patchwork, so it did go to the DT list. Must have been Bcc'ed.

The patches are also quoted-printable encoded which shouldn't be used.

Rob