Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932869AbXJSFu2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:50:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754071AbXJSFuT (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:50:19 -0400 Received: from filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu ([130.245.126.2]:33469 "EHLO filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754057AbXJSFuS (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:50:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:49:49 -0400 Message-Id: <200710190549.l9J5nnX8007119@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> From: Erez Zadok To: bfields@fieldses.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, neilb@suse.de, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: nfsv2 ref leak in 2.6.24? X-MailKey: Erez_Zadok Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1004 Lines: 20 I'm testing unionfs on top of nfsv2/3/4, using 2.6.24 as of linus's commit 4fa4d23fa20de67df919030c1216295664866ad7. A lot of my unionfs regression tests are failing on nfs2, b/c files that should be deleted, aren't. It feels like there may be a ref leak that prevents the files from being deleted, or maybe an unlink issue. It doesn't happen in all of my previous kernels w/ identical unionfs (code 2.6.9--2.6.23). And in 2.6.24 it happens only w/ nfs2 -- nfs3/4 are fine. I'm not sure if this is a client or server issue, and I'm only starting to dig deeper. But I thought I'd ask you in case this is a known problem and you have a fix. If this is the first you hear of this problem, let me know and I'll try to narrow it down further. Thanks, Erez. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/