Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:14:17 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, alyssa.milburn@linux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, samitolvanen@google.com,
        jpoimboe@kernel.org, joao@overdrivepizza.com, brgerst@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] x86/cfi: Fix FineIBT
Message-ID: <202306220913.2482F76F@keescook>
References: <20230622144218.860926475@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230622144218.860926475@infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 04:42:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Alyssa reported a FineIBT issue (patch 6) which led to the discovery of
> a kCFI issue (patch 5) and a bunch of cleanups and enhancements (the
> rest).
> 
> Backports can probably suffice with just the last two.
> 
> Much thanks to Brian for the better ret_from_fork() cleanup.
> 
> Tested using llvm-16 on an Alderlake with both FineIBT and kCFI.

Thanks! This looks really nice. For the series:

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook