Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 23 Jun 2023 08:53:36 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc:     Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
        vadfed@meta.com, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
        corbet@lwn.net, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
        vadfed@fb.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
        anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org,
        richardcochran@gmail.com, sj@kernel.org, javierm@redhat.com,
        ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com, mst@redhat.com, tzimmermann@suse.de,
        michal.michalik@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com, airlied@redhat.com,
        ogabbay@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, nipun.gupta@amd.com,
        axboe@kernel.dk, linux@zary.sk, masahiroy@kernel.org,
        benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com, geert+renesas@glider.be,
        milena.olech@intel.com, kuniyu@amazon.com, liuhangbin@gmail.com,
        hkallweit1@gmail.com, andy.ren@getcruise.com, razor@blackwall.org,
        idosch@nvidia.com, lucien.xin@gmail.com, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com,
        phil@nwl.cc, claudiajkang@gmail.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, poros@redhat.com,
        mschmidt@redhat.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API
Message-ID: <20230623085336.1a486ca3@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZJW37ynDxJCwHscN@nanopsycho>
References: <20230623123820.42850-1-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
        <ZJW37ynDxJCwHscN@nanopsycho>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:19:11 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> I don't understand. The discussion in the RFCv8 thread is still going
> on. The things I mentioned there are ignored. Like for example:
> 1) mode_set op removal
> 2) odd ice dpll locking scheme (either fix or describe why it is ok -
> 				that's the unfinished discussion)
> 3) header file bits squash I suggested. Vadim wrote that it sounds
>    reasonable, yet nothing changed
> 
> I thought we are past this. Why I have to point the same issues over and
> over?

FWIW I'm lost in the previous thread, so for me there's value in
refreshing the series.

But you're right, at the very least there should be a summary of
outstanding issues / open items / ongoing discussions in the cover
letter.