Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <d9b7c170-ed0d-5d37-e099-20d233115943@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date:   Sat, 24 Jun 2023 15:54:12 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] seqlock: Do the lockdep annotation before locking
 in do_write_seqcount_begin_nested()
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.co>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
References: <20230623171232.892937-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <20230623171232.892937-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20230623171232.892937-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2023/06/24 2:12, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>  include/linux/seqlock.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> index 3926e90279477..d778af83c8f36 100644
> --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
> @@ -512,8 +512,8 @@ do {									\
>  
>  static inline void do_write_seqcount_begin_nested(seqcount_t *s, int subclass)
>  {
> -	do_raw_write_seqcount_begin(s);
>  	seqcount_acquire(&s->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
> +	do_raw_write_seqcount_begin(s);
>  }
>  
>  /**

Why not to do the same on the end side?

 static inline void do_write_seqcount_end(seqcount_t *s)
 {
- 	seqcount_release(&s->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
 	do_raw_write_seqcount_end(s);
+	seqcount_release(&s->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
 }