Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date:   Sun, 25 Jun 2023 07:30:48 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From:   "Yajun Deng" <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Message-ID: <a18b0cf466191b0d692e431fe33c7c80@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all 
 architectures
To:     v-songbaohua@oppo.com
Cc:     "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>, corbet@lwn.net,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
        robin.murphy@arm.com, paulmck@kernel.org, bp@suse.de,
        peterz@infradead.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, kim.phillips@amd.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, ardb@kernel.org,
        bhe@redhat.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
        song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        iommu@lists.linux.dev,
        "=?utf-8?B?UGV0ciBUZXNhxZnDrWs=?=" <petr@tesarici.cz>,
        "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Barry Song" <baohua@kernel.org>, 21cnbao@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <20230623174046.66ce934bcf5c1303003a5afc@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20230623174046.66ce934bcf5c1303003a5afc@linux-foundation.org>
 <20230515094955.GB23880@lst.de>
 <20230512094210.141540-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
 <055f964384a2bb4ba51c64a0be6072c9@linux.dev>
 <20230515133821.769158bb@meshulam.tesarici.cz>
Precedence: bulk

June 24, 2023 8:40 AM, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:=
=0A=0A> On Mon, 15 May 2023 13:38:21 +0200 Petr Tesa=C5=99=C3=ADk <petr@t=
esarici.cz> wrote:=0A> =0A>> On Mon, 15 May 2023 11:23:27 +0000=0A>> "Yaj=
un Deng" <yajun.deng@linux.dev> wrote:=0A>> =0A>> May 15, 2023 5:49 PM, "=
Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de> wrote:=0A> =0A> This looks fine to me. Ca=
n you please work with Barry to make sure=0A> the slight different place =
of the initcall doesn't break anything=0A> for his setup? I doubt it woul=
d, but I'd rather have a Tested-by:=0A> tag.=0A>> Barry's email is no lon=
ger in use. I can't reach him.=0A>> =0A>> Which one? I would hope that hi=
s Gmail account is still valid:=0A>> =0A>> Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>=
=0A> =0A> Maybe his kernel.org address works...=0A> =0A> I have this patc=
h stuck in limbo for 6.4. I guess I'll carry it over=0A> into the next -r=
c cycle, see what happens.=0A> =0A> fwiw, it has been in -next for six we=
eks, no known issues.=0A=0AHi, Barry, The slight different place of the i=
nitcall, does break anything?