Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 25 Jun 2023 20:50:09 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To:     Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memory-failure: remove unneeded page state check in
 shake_page()
Message-ID: <ZJiacZIkvIv1P3AK@casper.infradead.org>
References: <20230625113430.2310385-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230625113430.2310385-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 07:34:30PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> Remove unneeded PageLRU(p) and is_free_buddy_page(p) check as slab caches
> are not shrunk now. This check can be added back when a lightweight range
> based shrinker is available.

On further review, I think you've misunderstood the entire situation
here and no patch should be applied.

> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> ---
>  mm/memory-failure.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 5b663eca1f29..92f951df3e87 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -373,11 +373,10 @@ void shake_page(struct page *p)
>  	if (PageHuge(p))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (!PageSlab(p)) {
> -		lru_add_drain_all();
> -		if (PageLRU(p) || is_free_buddy_page(p))
> -			return;
> -	}
> +	if (PageSlab(p))
> +		return;
> +
> +	lru_add_drain_all();
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * TODO: Could shrink slab caches here if a lightweight range-based
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 
>