Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <71bd6de4-2cde-54eb-5720-3665d421d8ea@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2023 08:56:40 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] Randomized slab caches for kmalloc()
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, cocci@inria.fr,
        Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
        Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
        Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
        "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Wang Weiyang <wangweiyang2@huawei.com>,
        Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
References: <20230616111843.3677378-1-gongruiqi@huaweicloud.com>
 <570d788b-d7f3-64ab-97e1-4e847aef1321@web.de>
From:   "GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi@huaweicloud.com>
In-Reply-To: <570d788b-d7f3-64ab-97e1-4e847aef1321@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 2023/06/23 16:30, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> I adapted the v2 patch to …
> 
> I suggest to omit the cover letter for a single patch.
> 
> Will any patch series evolve for your proposed changes?
> 

Usually I wouldn't made a cover letter for a single patch, while this
case is an exception because I need a place to hold the additional
explanation about its transformation from RFC patch to formal patch.

> Regards,
> Markus