Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp15519331rwd; Sun, 25 Jun 2023 19:38:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5N6UsBKf1JmWYaUQLnoWQO/pOv8PUJVoldwdycMohA53RsjGr6Pycvqu2Xq+9SFcZsjjYx X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:8e2a:b0:126:5459:25d9 with SMTP id y42-20020a056a208e2a00b00126545925d9mr7103315pzj.29.1687747099188; Sun, 25 Jun 2023 19:38:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1687747099; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BrNUmQx2mLWsLSQwFBfacZltRW9HbZD2nNkDjfx5GQBX8TQpkzDAPHvtEzVUw+6M9l tG3tsCceKfzY58dGuNWxsJIm/wyan6wfbSd6rnAeEeiZhgZ58TVx9QVmPARQSphiFgDG 215yeFPh7rwKtNYCJQy5gRBnZv35r7PUXrUs2XnHqC7k0V9YDwyGDekCVAuxC2pA5Ds8 lKl7SBhxEdOH4fXfUW8u9RZS6TkYkMEPvJogMitcsz24oT/2NNM4ECFR9zpAA8EE6LdF uDiB71QBjxSowDdfSjM3lRWxnBd35ExI7K35tulkailWkga6NhZol/1ANjr5cuEBUllE 1qiA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=29YxKu8CuyBEmqU0GHZXnFopqe/zMgkhbvSXcLqKU6k=; fh=9Ite4yH4+txz1J4zM7XnnSvcCgcEQTX+eh0wsPez7LQ=; b=drIR/P/P5hTiZH+Xq1FcG5SQKZ5zT8671AvK9PUfv5KIQUdosEk1e3cy6cnlkwFCwt hczJyrtaPmafJm2ypkXasE8aqHpHjuuPj8eXWOHfZSsefihWCUbU/+j3v3lBuAF8DZCc AA6znvAdNo9GB5sk70fAjUJ9Y9dXwuOuOmCtRQizv+32WKPUHBbeOBkTA/fvsYkdaw8G pVGY1oXoWlY1Jpy2hnNwYpaxqsAdW5qURh7fcc43106DXiB2UFM+ul8OiTdOMfrt2PAo AchxEGvFY7kAZ6QCWjHo1EbsezmSVREoskBROE41ZK96Y4IbBNxbTgC22Bu2NOXf4k5S MwqA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k16-20020a63f010000000b00543c1b205a5si4367734pgh.149.2023.06.25.19.38.07; Sun, 25 Jun 2023 19:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230000AbjFZC2O (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 25 Jun 2023 22:28:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35646 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229506AbjFZC2N (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jun 2023 22:28:13 -0400 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC29AB1; Sun, 25 Jun 2023 19:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.143]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4QqBbD054cz4f3nbl; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:28:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.176.73] (unknown [10.174.176.73]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgBn0LO395hkXGkxMg--.37238S3; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:28:08 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] md/raid10: optimize fix_read_error To: linan666@huaweicloud.com, song@kernel.org Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linan122@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" References: <20230623173236.2513554-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com> <20230623173236.2513554-2-linan666@huaweicloud.com> From: Yu Kuai Message-ID: <292862ac-f0e0-6068-eb16-511a01f185b2@huaweicloud.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:28:07 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20230623173236.2513554-2-linan666@huaweicloud.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgBn0LO395hkXGkxMg--.37238S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxWryfCw1DXr43tF4kJF1DKFg_yoW5ZryUpF WDua4FvrWDJFyUZF17tFWDC3ZYy34fGFWUKr4rt34fWw1Skr9xKF18Wryavr1kJF93uw17 Zas8ursrCFs7tF7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUkC14x267AKxVW8JVW5JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK02 1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26w1j6s0DM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4U JVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gc CE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E 2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJV W8JwACjcxG0xvEwIxGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1lc7I2V7IY0VAS07AlzVAY IcxG8wCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14 v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jw0_GFylIxkG c2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI 0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rW3Jr0E3s1lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_ Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjfUoOJ5UU UUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, ?? 2023/06/24 1:32, linan666@huaweicloud.com ะด??: > From: Li Nan > > We dereference r10_bio->read_slot too many times in fix_read_error(). > Optimize it by using a variable to store read_slot. > Other than a nit below, this patch LGTM. Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai > Signed-off-by: Li Nan > --- > drivers/md/raid10.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c > index 381c21f7fb06..94ae294c8a3c 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c > @@ -2725,10 +2725,10 @@ static int r10_sync_page_io(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t sector, > static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio) > { > int sect = 0; /* Offset from r10_bio->sector */ > - int sectors = r10_bio->sectors; > + int sectors = r10_bio->sectors, slot = r10_bio->read_slot; > struct md_rdev *rdev; > int max_read_errors = atomic_read(&mddev->max_corr_read_errors); > - int d = r10_bio->devs[r10_bio->read_slot].devnum; > + int d = r10_bio->devs[slot].devnum; > > /* still own a reference to this rdev, so it cannot > * have been cleared recently. > @@ -2749,13 +2749,13 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10 > pr_notice("md/raid10:%s: %pg: Failing raid device\n", > mdname(mddev), rdev->bdev); > md_error(mddev, rdev); > - r10_bio->devs[r10_bio->read_slot].bio = IO_BLOCKED; > + r10_bio->devs[slot].bio = IO_BLOCKED; > return; > } > > while(sectors) { > int s = sectors; > - int sl = r10_bio->read_slot; > + int sl = slot; > int success = 0; > int start; > > @@ -2790,7 +2790,7 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10 > sl++; > if (sl == conf->copies) > sl = 0; > - } while (!success && sl != r10_bio->read_slot); > + } while (!success && sl != slot); > rcu_read_unlock(); > > if (!success) { > @@ -2798,16 +2798,16 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10 > * as bad on the first device to discourage future > * reads. > */ > - int dn = r10_bio->devs[r10_bio->read_slot].devnum; > + int dn = r10_bio->devs[slot].devnum; > rdev = conf->mirrors[dn].rdev; > > if (!rdev_set_badblocks( > rdev, > - r10_bio->devs[r10_bio->read_slot].addr > + r10_bio->devs[slot].addr > + sect, > s, 0)) { > md_error(mddev, rdev); > - r10_bio->devs[r10_bio->read_slot].bio > + r10_bio->devs[slot].bio > = IO_BLOCKED; There is no need to split lines now. Thanks, Kuai > } > break; > @@ -2816,7 +2816,7 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10 > start = sl; > /* write it back and re-read */ > rcu_read_lock(); > - while (sl != r10_bio->read_slot) { > + while (sl != slot) { > if (sl==0) > sl = conf->copies; > sl--; > @@ -2850,7 +2850,7 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10 > rcu_read_lock(); > } > sl = start; > - while (sl != r10_bio->read_slot) { > + while (sl != slot) { > if (sl==0) > sl = conf->copies; > sl--; >