Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:21:42 +0300
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To:     Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memblock: Introduce memblock_reserve_node()
Message-ID: <ZJkudvnGz+Tt5Qml@kernel.org>
References: <20230625050850.GJ52412@kernel.org>
 <20230624024622.2959376-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
 <4c361d62e0b77242fe4b8592c82c4d90@linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4c361d62e0b77242fe4b8592c82c4d90@linux.dev>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 07:39:10AM +0000, Yajun Deng wrote:
> June 25, 2023 1:08 PM, "Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 10:46:22AM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote:
> > 
> >> It only returns address now in memblock_find_in_range_node(), we can add a
> >> parameter pointing to integer for node id of the range, which can be used
> >> to pass the node id to the new reserve region.
> >> 
> >> Introduce memblock_reserve_node() so that the node id can be passed to
> >> the reserve region in memblock_alloc_range_nid().
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
> > 
> > What problem does this patch solve?
> >
> 
> If we set nid and flags in memblock_alloc_range_nid(), we may not need
> memblock_set_node() in memmap_init_reserved_pages().

When memblock_reserve() is called before NUMA setup, the node ids are still
unset in memblock.memory, so very early reservations will be missed and we
still have to update node ids in memblock.reserved later.
 
> I tested this patch and delete memblock_set_node() in memmap_init_reserved_pages().
> It works fine. I did not delete memblock_set_node() in this patch just in case.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.