Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <d3970163-b8e8-9665-3761-8942c28adaa8@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:41:09 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] scsi: dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Fix warning for sdm845
 by adding reg-names
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20230623113009.2512206-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org>
 <20230623113009.2512206-6-abel.vesa@linaro.org>
 <cd84b8c6-fac7-ecef-26be-792a1b04a102@linaro.org>
 <CTK1AI4TVYRZ.F77OZB62YYC0@otso> <20230623211746.GA1128583-robh@kernel.org>
 <CTMDIQGOYMKD.1BP88GSB03U54@otso>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <CTMDIQGOYMKD.1BP88GSB03U54@otso>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 26/06/2023 08:38, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>> but I guess no resends and it can be superseded.
>>>
>>> Right, the patches got reviews but was never applied... I really need to
>>> find a strategy to keep track of sent patches until they're applied with
>>> my work mailbox, it's not the first time that a patch has gotten
>>> forgotten.
>>
>> There was an error reported on the above series. Why would it be 
>> applied?
> 
> The error report at [0] complains about reg-names but I'm quite sure
> that patch 2/3 resolves this error. Does your bot only apply one patch
> at a time and run the check or apply all of them and then run it? It's
> been a while but I'm fairly sure I ran all of the checks before sending
> since I also documented some other patches in the cover letter there.

You did it in cover letter, not in the patch, so there is no dependency
for bots recorded.

> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/167241769341.1925758.17856681634949446114.robh@kernel.org/

Your patch 2/3 could not be applied to any tree. 3/3 applied but without
previous one caused warnings.


Best regards,
Krzysztof