Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2023 18:12:31 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
Message-ID: <20230626181231.70405c1f@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <2947430.1687765706@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
References: <20230626112847.2ef3d422@canb.auug.org.au>
        <2947430.1687765706@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/1Ge+Wr0ku4FcBxMax3jOKWi";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/1Ge+Wr0ku4FcBxMax3jOKWi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi David,

On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 08:48:26 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrot=
e:
>
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>=20
> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
> > failed like this:
> >=20
> > In file included from builtin-trace.c:907:
> > trace/beauty/msg_flags.c: In function 'syscall_arg__scnprintf_msg_flags=
':
> > trace/beauty/msg_flags.c:28:21: error: 'MSG_SPLICE_PAGES' undeclared (f=
irst use in this function) =20
>=20
> I tried applying the attached patch, but it doesn't make any difference.

I wonder if it is using the system headers?  Or depends on "make headers-in=
stall"?

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

--Sig_/1Ge+Wr0ku4FcBxMax3jOKWi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmSZSG8ACgkQAVBC80lX
0Gxg/ggAkTZ+/82QjJe4wJrDgQ+zyJhq4vhN3TFH56b9I64FB9blMUZicISKfQte
O/y63r6wPVD5Tsjc8v81egJO+i4/jXd/jp4i+ce7xSNDk0uSIjeRoXr8wMD3R793
Z0925rEhClPbyGwjhNZulvAOEcNZOyN/2A8z+zFSN/3ie6bTNxWNrVXkN1P25RTd
FAQYiT+YtY5taSmAnmO+O7ckJl69o3K8xUPct4a0oeEWxgNnjrXfKlhAUyFZzLzv
TjYK7Vk3KfGKJ2rGrLEw2RlgaIMMJ5/3NupwFqbpa6UMHtyMfv+5Z2EzHVs8BqFJ
G9IHURBU29V9G16Lrjo2uPr0UBOIaw==
=IP/A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/1Ge+Wr0ku4FcBxMax3jOKWi--