Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <d0b6f2c9-8e85-a38b-e2b1-14f197ca1ea0@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:30:52 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: nvmem: sec-qfprom: Add bindings for
 secure qfprom
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230623141806.13388-1-quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com>
 <20230623141806.13388-2-quic_kbajaj@quicinc.com>
 <cea67754-6bc0-f8ee-3cba-8713b10b0c69@linaro.org>
 <d9cde55b-fc96-b024-8048-1de1fa1bd89e@quicinc.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <d9cde55b-fc96-b024-8048-1de1fa1bd89e@quicinc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 26/06/2023 10:22, Komal Bajaj wrote:
>>
>>> +
>>> +allOf:
>>> +  - $ref: nvmem.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - enum:
>>> +          - qcom,qdu1000-sec-qfprom
>>> +      - const: qcom,sec-qfprom
>>> +
>>> +  reg:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - description: The secure qfprom corrected region.
>>> +
>>> +  # Needed if any child nodes are present.
>>> +  "#address-cells":
>>> +    const: 1
>>> +  "#size-cells":
>>> +    const: 1
>> Drop both, they are not needed.
> 
> I didn't get it. Can you please explain why these are not needed as this
> node will have child nodes which will use single value for address and size.

I suspect they are already defined. Do other bindings (for cases with
children) have them? If not, why here it would be different?


Best regards,
Krzysztof