Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2023 13:44:34 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
        Michael Brunner <michael.brunner@kontron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ACPI: platform: Ignore SMB0001 only when it has
 resources
Message-ID: <ZJlsEggaJZc9u15T@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20230621151652.79579-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <CAJZ5v0jt8XCzUxQaBXLz0zXezih1Urq=dt-K9PWVY1JpN=Go6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZJSQf07cO6qmNyCn@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <CAJZ5v0iKLtQpUnhMqB6zgwbURXGFZkje5rNORS9MLqYN=13nWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZJlJFtsXoC6JyLxY@smile.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <ZJlJFtsXoC6JyLxY@smile.fi.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 11:15:19AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 04:43:55PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 8:19 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 05:53:13PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 5:16 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

...

> > BTW, this doesn't need to increment the count even.  It could just
> > terminate the walk on the first valid resource found and tell the
> > caller to return true in that case.
> 
> Indeed, thank you for the hint!

Actually it's doesn't matter if we count them or not, we still must use the
context of the call to set up a flag or whatever. With the current code in mind
I prefer to count resources and compare that to be non-zero. This will help to
read and understand code better.

That said, I will go with (*counter)++;

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko