Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935519AbXJSXqg (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:46:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756645AbXJSXq1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:46:27 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:51106 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755160AbXJSXq1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:46:27 -0400 Message-ID: <471941CC.6020200@garzik.org> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:46:20 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" CC: LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] irq-remove: core References: <20071019075443.GA6407@havoc.gtf.org> <20071019075508.GB6407@havoc.gtf.org> <4718F5BB.5010301@garzik.org> <47190C80.8090400@garzik.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.9 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1415 Lines: 36 Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Jeff Garzik writes: > >> Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> Jeff Garzik writes: >>>> Do you think set_irqfunc_irq() should be called at all the callsites of >>>> set_irq_regs(), or one the fix you mention is applied, do you think current >>>> model is sufficient? >>> Good question. At first glance I think the call sites are ok, that >>> is where we have the information now. Non-genirq architectures needs >>> work of course. >>> >>> However given the weird poll case etc that either we need to take this >>> slow and delay this change until all of the drivers are fixed up, to >>> not need an irq parameter (as you suggested). Or that we need to allow both >>> forms of irq handler to coexist temporarily. >> After diving in, in the past couple of hours, I'm pretty confident we simply do >> not need {get,set}_irqfunc_irq() > > Sounds good. That was my impression when I was looking at this kind of stuff. > > Just so long as this doesn't slow us down so much we don't actually drop the > ball on this. Hey I'm the one who has kept the ball rolling since the day pt_regs were removed... :) Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/