Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2023 21:31:56 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] writeback: Factor writeback_iter_init() out of
 write_cache_pages()
Message-ID: <ZJpmPOEH7rYkETsQ@infradead.org>
References: <20230626173521.459345-1-willy@infradead.org>
 <20230626173521.459345-8-willy@infradead.org>
 <ZJplzwnPBHo4ZK60@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZJplzwnPBHo4ZK60@infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 09:30:07PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 06:35:16PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > +	for (folio = writeback_iter_init(mapping, wbc);
> > +	     folio;
> > +	     folio = writeback_get_next(mapping, wbc)) {
> 
> Ok that's another way to structure it.  Guess I should look over the
> whole series first..

That beeing said.  Given that writeback_iter_init calls 
writeback_get_next anyway,

	writeback_iter_init(mapping, wbc);
	while ((folio = writeback_get_next(mapping, wbc)))

still feels a little easier to follow to be.  No hard feelings either
way, just an observation.