Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <074fc253-beb4-f7be-14a1-ee5f4745c15b@suse.cz>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:28:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mprotect: allow unfaulted VMAs to be unaccounted on
 mprotect()
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
References: <20230626204612.106165-1-lstoakes@gmail.com>
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20230626204612.106165-1-lstoakes@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 6/26/23 22:46, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> When mprotect() is used to make unwritable VMAs writable, they have the
> VM_ACCOUNT flag applied and memory accounted accordingly.
> 
> If the VMA has had no pages faulted in and is then made unwritable once
> again, it will remain accounted for, despite not being capable of extending
> memory usage.
> 
> Consider:-
> 
> ptr = mmap(NULL, page_size * 3, PROT_READ, MAP_ANON | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
> mprotect(ptr + page_size, page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
> mprotect(ptr + page_size, page_size, PROT_READ);

In the original Mike's example there were actual pages populated, in that
case we still won't merge the vma's, right? Guess that can't be helped.

> The first mprotect() splits the range into 3 VMAs and the second fails to
> merge the three as the middle VMA has VM_ACCOUNT set and the others do not,
> rendering them unmergeable.
> 
> This is unnecessary, since no pages have actually been allocated and the
> middle VMA is not capable of utilising more memory, thereby introducing
> unnecessary VMA fragmentation (and accounting for more memory than is
> necessary).
> 
> Since we cannot efficiently determine which pages map to an anonymous VMA,
> we have to be very conservative - determining whether any pages at all have
> been faulted in, by checking whether vma->anon_vma is NULL.
> 
> We can see that the lack of anon_vma implies that no anonymous pages are
> present as evidenced by vma_needs_copy() utilising this on fork to
> determine whether page tables need to be copied.
> 
> The only place where anon_vma is set NULL explicitly is on fork with
> VM_WIPEONFORK set, however since this flag is intended to cause the child
> process to not CoW on a given memory range, it is right to interpret this
> as indicating the VMA has no faulted-in anonymous memory mapped.
> 
> If the VMA was forked without VM_WIPEONFORK set, then anon_vma_fork() will
> have ensured that a new anon_vma is assigned (and correctly related to its
> parent anon_vma) should any pages be CoW-mapped.
> 
> The overall operation is safe against races as we hold a write lock against
> mm->mmap_lock.
> 
> If we could efficiently look up the VMA's faulted-in pages then we would
> unaccount all those pages not yet faulted in. However as the original
> comment alludes this simply isn't currently possible, so we remain
> conservative and account all pages or none at all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>

So in practice programs will likely do the PROT_WRITE in order to actually
populate the area, so this won't trigger as I commented above. But it can
still help in some cases and is cheap to do, so:

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

> ---
>  mm/mprotect.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> index 6f658d483704..9461c936082b 100644
> --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> @@ -607,8 +607,11 @@ mprotect_fixup(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  	/*
>  	 * If we make a private mapping writable we increase our commit;
>  	 * but (without finer accounting) cannot reduce our commit if we
> -	 * make it unwritable again. hugetlb mapping were accounted for
> -	 * even if read-only so there is no need to account for them here
> +	 * make it unwritable again except in the anonymous case where no
> +	 * anon_vma has yet been assigned.
> +	 *
> +	 * hugetlb mapping were accounted for even if read-only so there is
> +	 * no need to account for them here.
>  	 */
>  	if (newflags & VM_WRITE) {
>  		/* Check space limits when area turns into data. */
> @@ -622,6 +625,9 @@ mprotect_fixup(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  				return -ENOMEM;
>  			newflags |= VM_ACCOUNT;
>  		}
> +	} else if ((oldflags & VM_ACCOUNT) && vma_is_anonymous(vma) &&
> +		   !vma->anon_vma) {
> +		newflags &= ~VM_ACCOUNT;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -652,6 +658,9 @@ mprotect_fixup(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>  	}
>  
>  success:
> +	if ((oldflags & VM_ACCOUNT) && !(newflags & VM_ACCOUNT))
> +		vm_unacct_memory(nrpages);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * vm_flags and vm_page_prot are protected by the mmap_lock
>  	 * held in write mode.