Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759851AbXJTNOS (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:14:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752681AbXJTNOF (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:14:05 -0400 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:44759 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751025AbXJTNOD (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:14:03 -0400 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Message-ID: <4719FF0F.3080504@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:13:51 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070807 SeaMonkey/1.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Krzysztof Halasa CC: linux1394-user@lists.sourceforge.net, lkml Subject: Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version? References: <4714EF01.2060609@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <471527E5.1050407@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <47166C83.2050207@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <4719A0C4.3050301@s5r6.in-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 746 Lines: 21 Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > (the datasheet seems to suggest that) Well, as mentioned, I don't put much trust into the datasheet. It is incomplete regarding the 1.0/1.1 issue. > I wonder if OHCI 1.0 hardware based on VT6307 (and 6306) is > a common thing, or is it just an exception. Both chips are quite widespread. From what I remember to have seen, most VT6307 are programmed in OHCI 1.1 mode while all VT6306 seem to be OHCI 1.0. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== =-=- =-=-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/