Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp17582266rwd; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 05:12:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4jyhCxAkkXyl2LKzYrvsXh+fVTtNYOAFJN1se4VyUsmbqetPlsgjujidHVbIPJP2aQvE46 X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:25c1:b0:1b6:6f12:502e with SMTP id jc1-20020a17090325c100b001b66f12502emr9266840plb.49.1687867926762; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 05:12:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1687867926; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Tr6Doxo33qcUHBvHgISzdkgbn6zGk+SQwwv/GP0hAKNQ2k4fB4E13WznSTQsKMN16V xkXNR81zeb6/+Z/EXznKx439HRWebimzQybC0eXwhc1FicHGhRlzz5q2IrZKt9zIohvw i6ZuiRR+RABTdnddEgAQKzHXHSiCaqD0myD72mYpWKMxePedtujiGg8RObjjzPm8BVAg uKpFX0aQvHGWovGmGTam9vKU/sJpwNlrGJ7JZV3EHryunPd7yJci6OHnfrcQ03alJnKI H9/ugdBFahmbLYDZGhND8x2iN3aj9XnG5xoFpk2VzHhkq/qyW8RwEfFbYIPUe6XH3kIv V1cg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=o3gH56krg3o+MhlxD3hH4pcrR2ZlnqXpJb3pt9aQMK8=; fh=aE95h/ivEzl/EGS4UilDS3oTsP2ObOA/9rmz26R9FLw=; b=gqw54HjM/RKlduzxzfxyjv6Lsv7a9Xp/3Y28g0AAyvK6hR0qlf2I4vbrRh0i2HcL6B UPwKLOYPGhTjeAwkTMqcbqAuZ38Sxw4g1RSFIVgxMDGvF0cJ0yhT9bi+falX5hTmszJh FsPuuFL0pmwM37ov84lue761feCK/jUfTzYusm5SxOuu8Inh2lBUHOtqB3lTBWWZGMWR T+hjd4sp73tNK7FPWAYTTgC/YgHWKHETA/s2KxZ0IInxPMsSPt0Vx7pEs9pPlWDvZLdX uxoLyHVCmaci8beV9OaHrN+xKA9mAdVXSWknHmaFlWptJ5rx6EktXqffJtfRnyTYTZg7 t6Uw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=rNwSRvie; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w5-20020a170902ca0500b001b7f53625aesi5000829pld.153.2023.06.27.05.11.54; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 05:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=rNwSRvie; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231744AbjF0MEB (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:04:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32864 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229748AbjF0MEA (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:04:00 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0BC21A2; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 05:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-666ecb21f86so4317819b3a.3; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 05:03:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687867439; x=1690459439; h=message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=o3gH56krg3o+MhlxD3hH4pcrR2ZlnqXpJb3pt9aQMK8=; b=rNwSRvie7WyEG+pwqLd6vSajpf0wrN6PYm8gTlZvVjI6ipe6Z/mFHnxmIGPzzs/n79 mRtzEd9fdwpLJ6eRbxQ+c/hIEPiSr738JbnpgnWKSV7fiR9g84H+xlJwVsgEOBC8SvKw g9yvG0UkovX3y8W0uwJp459SVihQ/cy8hAzSLozpCkjDvz77CZMKTR/g7TNkQlY24qA9 gweTLiA5vT3ITQvrtC4Ogmby+ZG6yATtjAxA6QujivGASYVxim1O/ZBlNGEH1mALkUy0 zc3qA6JLMKL9Q/0cilpVw5ebLqdZ+qDSVFtlU175UAtfjsnF0GtGTJYvdheCkBAu3lse ITUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687867439; x=1690459439; h=message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=o3gH56krg3o+MhlxD3hH4pcrR2ZlnqXpJb3pt9aQMK8=; b=DA21u2Ar7rCiC42ww6Is0QnR/DE8QwnY2jauRIbDGk0tD+1B/IhUd7Z+fWRbj1Ytop Z+0VG+QUO9raxzmNbRrU3BPES9hiMk1O3vdyrHiPKzkGJcyzecdbb886Y1B6mJIA2n88 xTyRuFTzOt1IBzjJ807Mbr6CJ857pw2R/djs0ZBmf0ubV8shvpAcqJqqeZnca0+HvqpQ kTEY2ExpGY9elKvIk3w4GElrlXZ352guig6yc6LnbD5vd75ynCddHYwMemzunQZI6x94 7m41Cw1I7xoboh8x73pOTwKl3v5cm8sanC9Lg4nJ+ZaCYvCwgkqzSItwhS5/AYzp6eQ+ cRNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzIqZTlIfd6wEFfJZ6ilPCT28qiQsT7gWYdn05sLKL1pUGPTke5 gNIZfhEioAAdEHT3eqE8JFo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:54aa:b0:112:2843:b546 with SMTP id i42-20020a056a2054aa00b001122843b546mr39998128pzk.58.1687867439166; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 05:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 377044c6c369.cse.ust.hk (191host097.mobilenet.cse.ust.hk. [143.89.191.97]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t4-20020a62ea04000000b0064d27a28451sm5296018pfh.100.2023.06.27.05.03.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 05:03:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Chengfeng Ye To: marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, lucien.xin@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chengfeng Ye Subject: [PATCH] sctp: fix potential deadlock on &net->sctp.addr_wq_lock Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:03:40 +0000 Message-Id: <20230627120340.19432-1-dg573847474@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org As &net->sctp.addr_wq_lock is also acquired by the timer sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler() in protocal.c, the same lock acquisition at sctp_auto_asconf_init() seems should disable irq since it is called from sctp_accept() under process context. Possible deadlock scenario: sctp_accept() -> sctp_sock_migrate() -> sctp_auto_asconf_init() -> spin_lock(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock) -> sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler() -> spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock); (deadlock here) This flaw was found using an experimental static analysis tool we are developing for irq-related deadlock. The tentative patch fix the potential deadlock by spin_lock_bh(). Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye --- net/sctp/socket.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c index cda8c2874691..b2c7d17ff848 100644 --- a/net/sctp/socket.c +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c @@ -364,9 +364,9 @@ static void sctp_auto_asconf_init(struct sctp_sock *sp) struct net *net = sock_net(&sp->inet.sk); if (net->sctp.default_auto_asconf) { - spin_lock(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock); + spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock); list_add_tail(&sp->auto_asconf_list, &net->sctp.auto_asconf_splist); - spin_unlock(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock); sp->do_auto_asconf = 1; } } -- 2.17.1