Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:46:51 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
        Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@nxp.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
        Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: dsa: felix: don't drop PTP frames with
 tag_8021q when RX timestamping is disabled
Message-ID: <20230627084651.055a228c@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230627151222.bn3vboqjutkqzxjs@skbuf>
References: <20230626154003.3153076-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
        <20230626154003.3153076-4-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
        <20230627151222.bn3vboqjutkqzxjs@skbuf>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:12:22 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> This is still not as good as I had wanted it, because simply checking
> for HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE does not distinguish between L2 and L4
> timestamping filters, and a port configured just with L2 traps will
> still drop L4 PTP packets.

Out of curiosity - quick survey on why your reply does not contain:

pw-bot: changes-requested

 a) your email address is different and the bot doesn't understand
    aliases
 b) commands are hard to remember
 c) don't care about patchwork
 d) laziness
 e) other