Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b0bb8387-9216-0fe7-61e9-7e2daceeef20@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <b0bb8387-9216-0fe7-61e9-7e2daceeef20@linuxfoundation.org>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:15:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whvD6pq-7vp-cCMEnS+EOp2TmLxFKPS3Nw+Ncqt0XZVGw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Kselftest update for Linux 6.5-rc1
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     shuah <shuah@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 25 Jun 2023 at 08:42, Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Please pull the following Kselftest update for Linux 6.5-rc1.

Hmm. I pulled this, but it causes multiple objtool warnings.

The cause seems to be __kunit_abort() being no-return and objtool
having not being told about it, and I'm double-checking the fix for
that.

But I'm unhappy with how clearly nobody seems to have looked at
non-fatal warning output again.

This was why we made the kernel use -Werror, because people would
ignore build warnings that weren't fatal. Now objtool warnings seem to
be triggering the same laissez-faire behavior.

               Linus