Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <9db7b307-11c7-2770-786d-5727d771aaa9@linux.dev>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2023 09:33:19 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] ext4: Ensure ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() is called
 for all prefetched BGs
To:     Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
        Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
 <05e648ae04ec5b754207032823e9c1de9a54f87a.1685449706.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
 <c3173405-713d-d2eb-bd9c-af8b8c747533@linux.dev>
 <ZJqG+rEl9DATNRIX@li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
In-Reply-To: <ZJqG+rEl9DATNRIX@li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Ojaswin,

On 6/27/23 14:51, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 10:00:57PM +0800, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 5/30/23 20:33, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
>>> Before this patch, the call stack in ext4_run_li_request is as follows:
>>>
>>>     /*
>>>      * nr = no. of BGs we want to fetch (=s_mb_prefetch)
>>>      * prefetch_ios = no. of BGs not uptodate after
>>>      * 		    ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait()
>>>      */
>>>     next_group = ext4_mb_prefetch(sb, group, nr, prefetch_ios);
>>>     ext4_mb_prefetch_fini(sb, next_group prefetch_ios);
>>>
>>> ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() will only try to initialize buddies for BGs in
>>> range [next_group - prefetch_ios, next_group). This is incorrect since
>>> sometimes (prefetch_ios < nr), which causes ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() to
>>> incorrectly ignore some of the BGs that might need initialization. This
>>> issue is more notable now with the previous patch enabling "fetching" of
>>> BLOCK_UNINIT BGs which are marked buffer_uptodate by default.
>>>
>>> Fix this by passing nr to ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() instead of
>>> prefetch_ios so that it considers the right range of groups.
>> Thanks for the series.
>>
>>> Similarly, make sure we don't pass nr=0 to ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() in
>>> ext4_mb_regular_allocator() since we might have prefetched BLOCK_UNINIT
>>> groups that would need buddy initialization.
>> Seems ext4_mb_prefetch_fini can't be called by ext4_mb_regular_allocator
>> if nr is 0.
> Hi Guoqing,
>
> Sorry I was on vacation so didn't get a chance to reply to this sooner.
> Let me explain what I meant by that statement in the commit message.
>
> So basically, the prefetch_ios output argument is incremented whenever
> ext4_mb_prefetch() reads a block group with !buffer_uptodate(bh).
> However, for BLOCK_UNINIT BGs the buffer is marked uptodate after
> initialization and hence prefetch_ios is not incremented when such BGs
> are prefetched.
>
> This leads to nr becoming 0 due to the following line (removed in this patch):
>
> 				if (prefetch_ios == curr_ios)
> 					nr = 0;
>
> hence ext4_mb_prefetch_fini() would never pre initialise the corresponding
> buddy structures. Instead, these structures would then get initialized
> probably at a later point during the slower allocation criterias. The
> motivation of making sure the BLOCK_UNINIT BGs' buddies are pre
> initialized is so the faster allocation criterias can utilize the data
> to make better decisions.

Got it, appreciate for the detailed explanation!

Thanks,
Guoqing