Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2023 13:40:40 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@huawei.com>,
        Wojciech Ziemba <wojciech.ziemba@intel.com>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
        john.garry@huawei.com, himanshu.madhani@cavium.com,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, uma.shankar@intel.com,
        anshuman.gupta@intel.com, animesh.manna@intel.com,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Introduce a new helper macro
 DEFINE_SHOW_STORE_ATTRIBUTE at seq_file.c
Message-ID: <ZJwOKJSgLg3Zhdxt@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <1605164864-58944-1-git-send-email-luojiaxing@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1605164864-58944-1-git-send-email-luojiaxing@huawei.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 03:07:38PM +0800, Luo Jiaxing wrote:
> We already own DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE() helper macro for defining attribute
> for read-only file, but we found many of drivers also want a helper macro
> for read-write file too.
> 
> So we add this macro to help decrease code duplication.

Is it abandoned?
Besides kbuildbot complains, can you simply reduce the scope to one subsystem
and resend?

Let's say USB is nice one and it has no issues according to kbuildbot.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko