Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp19197717rwd; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 06:25:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5m9YB2IGx1SinRkWGHwPTVYeF32CcIyyH0YeHBjVtmytddIJG+GiyxBzlmzt0JB7h64yuf X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5d0c:b0:988:7428:2c25 with SMTP id g12-20020a1709065d0c00b0098874282c25mr28814956ejt.5.1687958701291; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 06:25:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1687958701; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=f3uWxMs2t/av4MKEvpSS3QJtRZhHBUzp4nJvsy22E3c+k6QiWJPe9lFvHlLessl5u9 uxyG5ZnKCxS66P9Akkc09D6jnpTWlhfRdnkfcwvB5VBAZQ+fwI9WBYOyJ0uzgsz6ffoN YFCVOgiMTOO16kJ+GDHgs9uVAzrzMNDllK5Yf2loXD1Ae5dZRnnGsbemSgMwktF9zBrD /i1j64iEIfc2awi1tlJ6Z1km1e5xhq3B8gVDvviiDKe9ikWVsMBI21frBNbfdnqoBfAw ifvc7LsOdrC9pB/oElM76kJN0SmXaRYeaM2Cu9/2ECe4KI/jCBFIAcDZVRPeGMVBebLZ j9Aw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=WRpdRYwCVUxWCJVYhAUEF31YKZwSTOW8NvICrkzBkPE=; fh=QOUZCYc62iDiwtosvzrxKEygH1QGT5eEr4TokP/EdL0=; b=Koicu7WSMkSEx3eHWrZ8nSFrgmkrG5WcKSVgsOBvP9goshkP0ZvXXRGerN/LR+lfSL QABZFD3bW1H+rWJfjh40EreOpsCm+q8XTTtDKvfN9GqucFwh/uRY7bs8kwmuEatqqAEW 21IeNuEVjgqFkWU/WYwYrhOqWr9umIVieHyvm3E8kZ4+bB3hkzM3pssapYHqn+k3Uoa9 zAfUUJ9NLRs7BOjlODeg8p3m9oWg/yc3wjXUsyDqF7xkWaAafyLODq0o8dWj47byZ7Dl RzlfPWgORtWBh8rbSHXqg2cmFKQIWPgyjdD5hP4cqnitAg4qtbNfjn+eRUP8fdldQSnd jjSQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=HNnS0hRj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id kf24-20020a17090776d800b00988786fec30si5941930ejc.935.2023.06.28.06.24.36; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 06:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=HNnS0hRj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230512AbjF1NJG (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Jun 2023 09:09:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44228 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229456AbjF1NJE (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2023 09:09:04 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD1482118 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 06:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7027861328 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 13:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33EA5C433C0; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 13:09:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1687957742; bh=85FtdKdIsbU0gIgDRGh26jmPCHuf4Hh/V1a25xorEFA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HNnS0hRj6a/l1D8+PX9jSiDkxVpQAOez4ziw/2dQy8QloZ3M9kqaWhyuGnQAQDzvR oKUs8pjA5Y81tegFP6PqBZsMv5Ku4cb03LiuJ79yzB2Nka+tOV0gml6qLaqKv3jBU/ yXCgQ5tIGKX0Ydqyw1cd/zbqJ6ejY/cKRoRapZRytv+iozEA1+1UGTfbsSlKN8CMJ9 IuW4vafO/F6VVZZd48vZEt6Syj/6fkmSRx9VBsB+bjSS0ganrC5TFy4BKfaaxgP541 N34yleJB9nlI98lKel4ArtVHyxqF9PaPnz/VQGOImFXgh/BlA2sdekjLVpBg9mRtxy FF+dDhELqs6dg== Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:08:59 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Anna-Maria Behnsen , John Stultz , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Stephen Boyd , Eric Biederman , Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [patch 14/45] posix-timers: Consolidate interval retrieval Message-ID: References: <20230606132949.068951363@linutronix.de> <20230606142031.816970056@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20230606142031.816970056@linutronix.de> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:37:40PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner a ?crit : > There is no point to collect the current interval in the posix clock > specific settime() and gettime() callbacks. Just do it right in the common > code. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner The only difference I see is that we now return the old interval even if the target is reaped, which probably doesn't matter anyway. Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker