Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2023 09:21:24 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
        mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v6.5
Message-ID: <38f30730-3099-45fd-a38b-d3e2fc679737@paulmck-laptop>
Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org
References: <963d6eb8-6520-4c33-bbe8-6c76205bfd3d@paulmck-laptop>
 <CAHk-=whn4DGusRgq7ihBmu7vPBhvSDZsYN_ctef94E1rVbf5jA@mail.gmail.com>
 <fcc987bb-4ce4-4816-a909-cffa4c3f24ff@paulmck-laptop>
 <ZJw26orq0ZLEOL9q@ziepe.ca>
 <9b1a620a-975a-490f-b9ee-6aea7c8effe0@paulmck-laptop>
 <ZJw9EsEzQbo3pj0C@ziepe.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZJw9EsEzQbo3pj0C@ziepe.ca>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:00:50AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 06:46:50AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > The revert meant that 0-day didn't see -rcu without the single-argument
> > kfree_rcu() definition.
> 
> 0-day is also supposed to run on your branches, not just linux-next,
> at least it does for my trees..

It did complain back in February, but for whatever reason has not
complained about the lack fo single-argumen kfree_rcu() since then.

							Thanx, Paul