Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp19778754rwd; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 14:16:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6pCbQ5ka4Hz6Gb8bOKUqHPmfCo2lsHbGOCO3zYrQAmXTYx8KxxaculPhu9aKfkTNeVcuJb X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:1613:b0:126:ee92:2563 with SMTP id l19-20020a056a20161300b00126ee922563mr9912398pzj.59.1687986968240; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 14:16:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1687986968; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ONKTqtuoAA1wJCSNkUpLyzgblRW0E0ISL/LmGmhhXUbN63NOedWG8cc7igxVvUCQJm iytEsZnzv8sMHiK2hw/kHu7fkSvHX+5uAxTi32ioZD4pOySTd2avSecqU8MqLMOGFMCp iCGgM+g8Lz3vetW2tC9D0P7gHVjw7aYcAHDXVYJzZQPBkV03H8jFfdtiCCI3AeoJVVFv R8r3C22FqqbImqKwCAZ9mJw1oG6KJxYY842WBZrwhWApGFr6nQs+chNU2eHmbAOMSbK8 3RuYJ0qIBL/PHKE9x/1DMaJ/yUZMBgujvYuH8RMvzdiB7j/VAUKe0ciWp9ui790XcD7n riLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=F0uJ5eyJo3LYOyg4D0HXxOlZcJrEKyyXfBbdQHvI218=; fh=WKOxBQCBkKJEYHNk8gUZtM1FdSmLSIlhHGYfTk9Bdmc=; b=g/OzkVaS3EQAmL6jzdmOxuCnWa9nkcmRsyM788m85AiM1oAcju1DIz90thzKJ9aD5D izQCQdwzoY91rohyvJOHH320WbuL/faXxWKuz9NZXIFzp2xfIVithn7aKxXaFD5UVn+g 51xUKL+0K3D9oA/ZHN8IljIKQ309eEIhdKPSDnjSigir5cgoItcAtX3bE3WeQ3zPgd65 fzS5uR+lVLL7PsfWY1A1Ou3T7qdbHk0ZtVljVUvK9Y3VXzetateL9xezLz/lg0KL4q6d hJ+bFboqZjDhj/0oQkB8ENMPJPfYgz+RjZ8QH1wLc5NWinVZ4Cjuvn5BHU+R+OATlvtk 8oBw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=eip8RjzP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a185-20020a6390c2000000b00553c2f8509esi9978325pge.706.2023.06.28.14.15.56; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 14:16:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=eip8RjzP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232209AbjF1VKJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Jun 2023 17:10:09 -0400 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:39252 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232297AbjF1VJt (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2023 17:09:49 -0400 Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1052) id 2A50F20C08F5; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 14:09:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 2A50F20C08F5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1687986588; bh=F0uJ5eyJo3LYOyg4D0HXxOlZcJrEKyyXfBbdQHvI218=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eip8RjzP2VR+U/Tj0mijiWJqhp3Ef7m1mmdjIC6JfSkwi5O837SrouCnr/F1mdvMl jOT4pVM6MZIdqsV3MXfMQ4MSl64xLbewCtc+JMzRiM8brDAop9FEu/vYMhVn/RGdbr Hjuvbl/G6OzWmvW7l0lc+aTdXl53RF8GtAW5RZM4= From: Fan Wu To: corbet@lwn.net, zohar@linux.ibm.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, tytso@mit.edu, ebiggers@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, eparis@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, audit@vger.kernel.org, roberto.sassu@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Deven Bowers , Fan Wu Subject: [RFC PATCH v10 03/17] ipe: add evaluation loop Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 14:09:17 -0700 Message-Id: <1687986571-16823-4-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1687986571-16823-1-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> References: <1687986571-16823-1-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Deven Bowers IPE must have a centralized function to evaluate incoming callers against IPE's policy. This iteration of the policy for against the rules for that specific caller is known as the evaluation loop. Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers Signed-off-by: Fan Wu --- v2: + Split evaluation loop, access control hooks, and evaluation loop from policy parser and userspace interface to pass mailing list character limit v3: + Move ipe_load_properties to patch 04. + Remove useless 0-initializations Prefix extern variables with ipe_ + Remove kernel module parameters, as these are exposed through sysctls. + Add more prose to the IPE base config option help text. + Use GFP_KERNEL for audit_log_start. + Remove unnecessary caching system. + Remove comments from headers + Use rcu_access_pointer for rcu-pointer null check + Remove usage of reqprot; use prot only. +Move policy load and activation audit event to 03/12 v4: + Remove sysctls in favor of securityfs nodes + Re-add kernel module parameters, as these are now exposed through securityfs. + Refactor property audit loop to a separate function. v5: + fix minor grammatical errors + do not group rule by curly-brace in audit record, + reconstruct the exact rule. v6: + No changes v7: + Further split lsm creation into a separate commit from the evaluation loop and audit system, for easier review. + Propagating changes to support the new ipe_context structure in the evaluation loop. v8: + Remove ipe_hook enumeration; hooks can be correlated via syscall record. v9: + Remove ipe_context related code and simplify the evaluation loop. v10: + Split eval part and boot_verified part --- security/ipe/Makefile | 1 + security/ipe/eval.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ security/ipe/eval.h | 25 ++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+) create mode 100644 security/ipe/eval.c create mode 100644 security/ipe/eval.h diff --git a/security/ipe/Makefile b/security/ipe/Makefile index 16bbe80991f1..d7f2870d7c09 100644 --- a/security/ipe/Makefile +++ b/security/ipe/Makefile @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ # obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE) += \ + eval.o \ hooks.o \ ipe.o \ policy.o \ diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.c b/security/ipe/eval.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..59144b2ecdda --- /dev/null +++ b/security/ipe/eval.c @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "ipe.h" +#include "eval.h" +#include "hooks.h" +#include "policy.h" + +struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy; + +/** + * evaluate_property - Analyze @ctx against a property. + * @ctx: Supplies a pointer to the context to be evaluated. + * @p: Supplies a pointer to the property to be evaluated. + * + * Return: + * * true - The current @ctx match the @p + * * false - The current @ctx doesn't match the @p + */ +static bool evaluate_property(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx, + struct ipe_prop *p) +{ + return false; +} + +/** + * ipe_evaluate_event - Analyze @ctx against the current active policy. + * @ctx: Supplies a pointer to the context to be evaluated. + * + * This is the loop where all policy evaluation happens against IPE policy. + * + * Return: + * * 0 - OK + * * -EACCES - @ctx did not pass evaluation. + * * !0 - Error + */ +int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx) +{ + int rc = 0; + bool match = false; + enum ipe_action_type action; + struct ipe_policy *pol = NULL; + const struct ipe_rule *rule = NULL; + const struct ipe_op_table *rules = NULL; + struct ipe_prop *prop = NULL; + + rcu_read_lock(); + + pol = rcu_dereference(ipe_active_policy); + if (!pol) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + return 0; + } + + if (ctx->op == __IPE_OP_INVALID) { + action = pol->parsed->global_default_action; + goto eval; + } + + rules = &pol->parsed->rules[ctx->op]; + + list_for_each_entry(rule, &rules->rules, next) { + match = true; + + list_for_each_entry(prop, &rule->props, next) + match = match && evaluate_property(ctx, prop); + + if (match) + break; + } + + if (match) + action = rule->action; + else if (rules->default_action != __IPE_ACTION_INVALID) + action = rules->default_action; + else + action = pol->parsed->global_default_action; + + rcu_read_unlock(); +eval: + if (action == __IPE_ACTION_DENY) + rc = -EACCES; + + return rc; +} diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.h b/security/ipe/eval.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..972580dfec15 --- /dev/null +++ b/security/ipe/eval.h @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. + */ + +#ifndef _IPE_EVAL_H +#define _IPE_EVAL_H + +#include +#include + +#include "hooks.h" +#include "policy.h" + +extern struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy; + +struct ipe_eval_ctx { + enum ipe_op_type op; + + const struct file *file; +}; + +int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx); + +#endif /* _IPE_EVAL_H */ -- 2.25.1