Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@gmail.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/vboxsf: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_{page, folio}()
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2023 00:40:45 +0200
Message-ID: <2882298.SvYEEZNnvj@suse>
In-Reply-To: <6924669.18pcnM708K@suse>
References: <20230627135115.GA452832@sumitra.com> <ZJxqmEVKoxxftfXM@casper.infradead.org>
 <6924669.18pcnM708K@suse>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Precedence: bulk

On gioved=EC 29 giugno 2023 00:23:54 CEST Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:

[...]

>=20
> Shouldn't we call folio_lock() to lock the folio to be able to unlock with
> folio_unlock()?

Sorry, I wanted to write "If so, I can't find either a folio_lock() or a=20
page_lock() in this filesystem.".

=46abio
=20
> If so, I can't find any neither a folio_lock() or a page_lock() in this
> filesystem.
>=20
> Again sorry for not understanding, can you please explain it?
>=20
> >  	return err;
> > =20
> >  }