Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp20023225rwd; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 18:39:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4JwBOE7M+ELc6zXloUeTgTBxQa08jbrXjg23eqSnvbo/GYk21yYrsV0rVBuiOGHzv6+HjJ X-Received: by 2002:a92:d412:0:b0:345:ced4:b340 with SMTP id q18-20020a92d412000000b00345ced4b340mr2973473ilm.8.1688002784042; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 18:39:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1688002784; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wNkdc2zuFgnxD6Ews+b/36UkCjnb+W7rwxnJGl+HKEw184yM5RHiRyNLV+QofWw7hQ gzE60uldJ4i3A9I3lynw0L8E7zcMvdKFUIRYLlTDwqbHxZt325K3Znqu0LZwdEK3DqFt yUYKu1MxzruH7z3/e0dUgixRCUDaq/nwp4vSyl1Jw1dJ3A6bz6KPt+b6ljuunMK1kjRC xzu8H88OfWHaGN9jK8KeHe420K4JIs26EbRurCLItPlo8yCZqS3WEkp6Nl9BCLmvCbgM QuZ8jjf1FHMUVW29HFerVPPjkMdjh3NdlhoJZq5yxujgHLwYnwbXj//n1QpBMZxQLO62 LQgQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :organization:from:references:cc:to:content-language:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=4i2+mOeq+HK/t8BlRQfZ3mwkP2EWp4yvGq2n+VvbyzY=; fh=CfJI6sX/nhhNtcf0DmKYuK6PMh/Wge/JaYHcJoEx5S8=; b=b+RpXxT4g5+lC+wKHfBcEmWtAIJTYvJCefAN21pWFDZMyPQlU4j1K05YQl1G64bIpz jvPsWampI74eVkb5rJM4EtAHx37ZxI71CJgQ8rif3Kf5jnIJFzrL9oF1wJOB8srHW7E1 jDxlmmgRNgw1OChaVYiODbUKf0z9uvmSqo254VhO2Pv5+Hs6SXXfFeDpWjZZllIRD82w jw3sRNnPUWMjMcVPNZEmPkhYWK/RvTft9JVWRPt74lET4top28RZGOiEyIx6unn/YGBM HrkTWpw5w2eJeB0gBkG9UGdWhmsKOImbvgGzfxahQlbomOB7owEYIwZSnRmnoZA+4axC 3qkg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=tEth8uPn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l184-20020a6388c1000000b0054481da6ee5si9738756pgd.418.2023.06.28.18.39.32; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 18:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=tEth8uPn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231616AbjF2BOf (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Jun 2023 21:14:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39184 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229524AbjF2BOd (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2023 21:14:33 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 252E32694; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 18:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE2BD612CA; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 01:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC502C433C9; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 01:14:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1688001271; bh=OHfV9RkAhi/HBgdNbnfx7GoparhjCrP3HY0+yWmUQgo=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=tEth8uPntBrqzu+8geRiJPwf3br5LIsCMW/mtLPh+X5bqUakudEIGbXWin9DV77Fj JnVZSk8PeVn+M0bpPZEDikBLGOzXJL09uzgPcHkQVZ2ZURW5VF0tGzhCTWOSSGBYd8 Y+JS83ULr5af10Hqsyp5Yc1aE8Dj9HDZRPtcHYkWEOguo3pHUZcSZ+QJXQUpqK4yHV 3SGe3EkjMDABAdNGIOl3QTYBTZbR8XDMH5sH6uYYU8LljuoqfX1NegxBkkZQPMyNtt j11Q46yPwluXLhpuzluuuP8ZXvG+myMoVjYp/s64jMOtz8BbRN7/61uVUobkVzeHTg 3fxr33k+n2AOQ== Message-ID: <0f8160eb-f504-5069-5c78-783bce59b214@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 10:14:28 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] ublk: change ublk IO command defines to enum Content-Language: en-US To: Ming Lei Cc: Andreas Hindborg , Hans Holmberg , Aravind Ramesh , Jens Axboe , "open list:BLOCK LAYER" , Christoph Hellwig , Matias Bjorling , Andreas Hindborg , open list , gost.dev@samsung.com, Minwoo Im References: <20230628190649.11233-1-nmi@metaspace.dk> <20230628190649.11233-2-nmi@metaspace.dk> From: Damien Le Moal Organization: Western Digital Research In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/29/23 09:38, Ming Lei wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 07:47:47AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: >> On 6/29/23 04:06, Andreas Hindborg wrote: >>> From: Andreas Hindborg >>> >>> This change is in preparation for zoned storage support. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg >>> --- >>> include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ >>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h b/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h >>> index 4b8558db90e1..471b3b983045 100644 >>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h >>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h >>> @@ -229,12 +229,23 @@ struct ublksrv_ctrl_dev_info { >>> __u64 reserved2; >>> }; >>> >>> -#define UBLK_IO_OP_READ 0 >>> -#define UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE 1 >>> -#define UBLK_IO_OP_FLUSH 2 >>> -#define UBLK_IO_OP_DISCARD 3 >>> -#define UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE_SAME 4 >>> -#define UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE_ZEROES 5 >>> +enum ublk_op { >>> + UBLK_IO_OP_READ = 0, >>> + UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE = 1, >>> + UBLK_IO_OP_FLUSH = 2, >>> + UBLK_IO_OP_DISCARD = 3, >>> + UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE_SAME = 4, >>> + UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE_ZEROES = 5, >>> + UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_OPEN = 10, >>> + UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_CLOSE = 11, >>> + UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_FINISH = 12, >>> + UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_APPEND = 13, >>> + UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_RESET = 15, >>> + __UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_IN_START = 32, >>> + __UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_IN_END = 96, >>> + __UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_OUT_START = __UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_IN_END, >>> + __UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_OUT_END = 160, >>> +}; >> >> This patch does not do what the title says. You are also introducing the zone >> operations, and the very obscure __UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_XXX operations without an >> explanation. Also, why the "__" prefix for these ? I do not see the point... > > It should be to reserve space for ublk passthrough OP. A comment about that would be nice. > >> Given that this is a uapi, a comment to explain the less obvious commands would >> be nice. >> >> So I think the change to an enum for the existing ops can be done either in >> patch 2 or as a separate patch and the introduction of the zone operations done >> in patch 3 or as a separate patch. > > Also it might break userspace by changing to enum from macro for existed > definition, cause userspace may check something by '#ifdef UBLK_IO_OP_*', > so probably it is better to keep these OPs as enum, or at least keep > existed definition as macro. Then let's keep defining things with #define instead of an enum. > > Thanks, > Ming > -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research