Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <fce465f5-4d3d-aed1-e2f9-c7b31d72ce08@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2023 10:18:57 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/8] ALSA: hda: Update PCI ID list
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
References: <20230628205135.517241-1-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
 <20230628205135.517241-4-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
 <ZJxH7lcU4tSzCjb1@smile.fi.intel.com>
From:   =?UTF-8?Q?Amadeusz_S=c5=82awi=c5=84ski?= 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <ZJxH7lcU4tSzCjb1@smile.fi.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 6/28/2023 4:47 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:51:30PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
>> Use PCI device IDs from pci_ids.h header and while at it change to using
>> PCI_VDEVICE macro, to simplify declarations. This allows to change magic
>> number PCI vendor IDs to macro ones for all vendors. For Intel devices
>> use device IDs macros where defined.
> 
> ...
> 
>>   					((pci)->device == 0x490d) || \
>>   					((pci)->device == 0x4f90) || \
>>   					((pci)->device == 0x4f91) || \
>>   					((pci)->device == 0x4f92)))
> 
> Why are not these be added in the header as well for the sake of consistency?

Will do.

> 
> ...
> 
>>   	/* CPT */
>> -	{ PCI_DEVICE(0x8086, 0x1c20),
>> +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1c20),
>>   	  .driver_data = AZX_DRIVER_PCH | AZX_DCAPS_INTEL_PCH_NOPM },
> 
> With the first patch seems all of these (x86) can be converted
> to use PCI_DEVICE_DATA().
> 

Main reason is that some of device ids are missing and PCI_DEVICE_DATA() 
requires them to be defined. I didn't want to mix both PCI_VDEVICE() and 
PCI_DEVICE_DATA().