Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754802AbXJVD6k (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:58:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753617AbXJVD6b (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:58:31 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:55757 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751532AbXJVD6a (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:58:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:59:54 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Thomas Fricaccia Cc: Crispin Cowan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, LSM ML , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: LSM conversion to static interface Message-ID: <20071022035954.GA30991@kroah.com> References: <200710220224.l9M2Og5t020815@sapphire.spiritone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200710220224.l9M2Og5t020815@sapphire.spiritone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1362 Lines: 33 On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:24:42PM -0700, Thomas Fricaccia wrote: > Yes, I think Crispin has succinctly summed it up: irrevocably closing > the LSM prevents commercial customers from using security modules other > than that provided by their Linux distributor. Any "customer" using a security model other than provided by their Linux distributor instantly voided all support from that distro by doing that. So, since the support is gone, they can easily build their own kernels, with their own LSM interfaces, and get the exact same lack of support :) And, what are these "other LSM modules" you speak of that people rely on to run their businesses? > As Sarbanes-Oxley and > other regulatory laws require these customers to use "standard > kernels", the result is a rather dreary form of vendor lock-in, where the > security framework is coupled to the distribution. Wait, what? Since when does Sarbanes-Oxley decree that a company must use a "standard kernel"? And just exactly what defines such "standard kernel"? Can you point out where in that bill it requires such a thing? Totally confused, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/